How Do Lorentz Transformations Affect Light Signal Velocities?

JonathanT
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider a light signal propagating in some arbitrary direction, with

vx \neq 0
vy \neq 0
vz \neq 0 and

vx2 + vy2 + vz2 = c2


Use the Lorentz transformation equations for the components of velocity to show that


v'x2 + v'y2 + v'z2 = c2

Homework Equations



Combination of Velocities

v'x = (vx - V)/(1-vxV/c2)

v'y = (vy√1-V2/c2))/(1-vxV/c2)

v'z = (vz√1-V2/c2))/(1-vxV/c2)



The Attempt at a Solution



I know this is just a simple algebra proof but for some reason I'm getting stuck on it. Maybe I'm using the wrong equations?

I would really appreciate being shown where to start for this proof. Thanks in advance for the help and/or time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should get the transformation equations for vx, vy, vz to the prime variables and insert them into vx^2 +vy^2 +vz^2 = c^2 to show this reduces to vx'^2 +vy'^2 +vz'^2 = c^2. Since the speed of light is constant in all frames, the change in frames should be invariant under the lorentz transformation. Just be careful with your algebra...if it starts to get too messy then you probably did a simplification that led you in the wrong direction.
 
Thank you. I apparently was making a stupid algebra mistake and over complicating it. Just knowing I was heading in the right direction helped. Made me find my mistake. Thanks again.
 
no problem!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top