How do periods and masses relate in oscillating springs?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the relationship between the period of oscillation and mass in a spring-mass system. Participants emphasize the need for the correct equation that connects the period to the spring constant and mass, rather than using the phase constant equation. There is a debate on how adding mass affects oscillation speed, with some suggesting it slows down oscillations while others argue it reduces time. The correct approach involves deriving or identifying the appropriate formula linking these variables. Understanding this relationship is crucial for solving the problem effectively.
littlejon
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


phys 1.png


Homework Equations



phase constant: y= Asin(wt +phi)

The Attempt at a Solution


2*sin(360) =0
How does one approach this problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
littlejon said:

Homework Statement


View attachment 76173

Homework Equations



phase constant: y= Asin(wt +phi)

The Attempt at a Solution


2*sin(360) =0
How does one approach this problem?

Welcome to the PF.

The Relevant Equation that you list is not applicable. Look for an equation that relates the period of oscillation of a spring+mass system to the spring constant K and the mass m. (or else just derive the equation yourself from what you know about how springs and masses work...) :-)
 
Now that I look at it closely. The answer has got to be C because each oscillation is the same as the previous.
 
littlejon said:
Now that I look at it closely. The answer has got to be C because each oscillation is the same as the previous.

I don't think so. Adding mass will slow down the oscillations...
 
I see so the answer has got to be E since we know its the same cylinder it would reduce the time by twice.
 
littlejon said:
I see so the answer has got to be E since we know its the same cylinder it would reduce the time by twice.
No. You need the equation which relates period and mass.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top