B How do scientists measure mass, radius, and distance in astronomy?

AI Thread Summary
Scientists measure mass, radius, and distance in astronomy using various methods, including gravitational interactions and light analysis. The mass of celestial bodies is often determined through their gravitational effects on nearby objects, while radius can be inferred from brightness and temperature. Distance measurements rely on techniques like parallax and standard candles. The discussion emphasizes the importance of independent research, encouraging participants to explore resources like Google for deeper understanding. Overall, the conversation highlights the collaborative nature of learning in astronomy.
A Alex P
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
We know mass, radius, distance of Sun and other stars. We also know size, number of stars in our galaxy or others. But, how do scientists measure these parameters ?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Intermediate level means undergrad -- or did you pick this by accident ?
Can you google "astronomic distance measurement" ?
Any further questions after you've read some of that are welcome, of course.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn
BvU said:
Intermediate level means undergrad -- or did you pick this by accident ?
Can you google "astronomic distance measurement" ?
Any further questions after you've read some of that are welcome, of course.
It was a mistake. Thanks for noticing : ) : )
I know these methods. But how we can say that sun is at that much distace or its mass.
 
It's PF culture to encourage posters to do some research of their own :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes A Alex P
BvU said:
It's PF culture to encourage posters to do some research of their own :smile:
It's good. But what's answer... : ) : )
 
Last time I looked the question wasn't there yet...
What did you find ? Google is your friend. Whole story (and at the right level :smile:)
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top