How Do You Apply the Del Operator to a Momentum-Dependent Wave Function?

apenn121
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I've been given the question "What is ∇exp(ipr/ħ) ?"

I recognise that this is the del operator acting on a wave function but using the dot product of momentum and position in the wave function is new to me. The dot product is always scalar so I was wondering if it would be correct in writing that it is equal to prcosθ and then using the spherical coordinate del operator on the wave function to find the result. £
 
Physics news on Phys.org
apenn121 said:
so I was wondering if it would be correct in writing that it is equal to prcosθ
If you do that, you will be assuming the momentum is directed toward z axis, the result will not be so general then. Just expand the dot product in terms of Cartesian components.
For your future post in this section, please refer to our Guidelines which can be found at the top of the thread list.
 
In Cartesian coordinates, you will often see something like:
##\vec p = \hat x p_x+ \hat y p_y+\hat z p_z## and ##\vec r = \hat x f_x(x,y,z)+ \hat y f_y(x,y,z)+\hat z f_z(x,y,z)##
Then ## i\vec p \cdot \vec r = i (p_x f_x(x,y,z)+p_y f_y(x,y,z ) + p_z f_z(x,y,z)) ##
So you gradient would be
## \nabla W = \hat x (i \frac{\partial}{\partial x} (p_x f_x(x,y,z)+p_y f_y(x,y,z ) + p_z f_z(x,y,z)))W + \hat y (i \frac{\partial}{\partial y} (p_x f_x(x,y,z)+p_y f_y(x,y,z ) + p_z f_z(x,y,z)))W + \hat z (i \frac{\partial}{\partial z} (p_x f_x(x,y,z)+p_y f_y(x,y,z ) + p_z f_z(x,y,z)))W ##
In many cases, the functions of position might only depend on one of the spatial variables which can simplify the derivatives.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top