How Do You Calculate Degrees of Freedom in Diatomic Gases Like Oxygen?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the degrees of freedom in diatomic gases like oxygen (O2), one must consider both translational and rotational movements. Diatomic molecules have three translational degrees of freedom, corresponding to movement in three dimensions, and two rotational degrees of freedom, as they can spin around two axes. The total for diatomic gases is thus five degrees of freedom. The Equipartition theorem is relevant here, as it relates the degrees of freedom to the energy forms a molecule can possess. If the distance between the atoms in a diatomic molecule is not fixed, an additional degree of freedom may be considered.
vorcil
Messages
395
Reaction score
0
How do i figure out the degrees of freedom of a certain object/gas

for example oxygen gas

i know it's 02

two oxygen molecules

-

the degrees of freedom is supposibly 5

but how do you figure that out?

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
monoatomic gases have 3 degs of freedoms, diatomic (or, in general all that lie on a common line) 5 and three and polyatomic (if they do not lie on a common line like CO2 for example) 6.
 
Dickfore said:
monoatomic gases have 3 degs of freedoms, diatomic (or, in general all that lie on a common line) 5 and three and polyatomic (if they do not lie on a common line like CO2 for example) 6.

Yeah no, Not the answer i was looking for,

your answer, explains it empirically, you can't actually tell me why it is 3,5 ect...

-

I've been reading about the Equipartition theorem, and it has to do with each form of energy a particle, or molecule can have, and the degrees of freedom is the sum of all the different forms of energy it can posses.

thanks for trying, but I'm needing a better explanation.
 
Monatomic can move in three dimensions, but any rotation doesn't really change how it looks (some quantum effect, I've heard). Hence 3 degrees of freedom.
Diatomic, like your oxygen molecule, can move in three dimensions and spin in two. Now why not three? Really, same explanation as before - the last axis spins the molecule, but you couldn't tell the difference anyway, so some quantum effect says it's not really a dergree of freedom. Hence 3 moving and 2 spinning = 5 degrees of freedom.
 
One way to look at degrees of freedom is to ask yourself: if I have a particle of the system (an atom, a molecule, anything), how many numbers do I have to give to specify its position / orientation (what we call the configuration)?

So for instance, for a gas of monoatomic particles, you need 3 numbers to specify the position (x, y and z) and it doesn't have any discernible orientation, so its total degrees of freedom is 3.

For a gas of diatomic particles, for each particle you need again 3 numbers to specify its position (this is usually always so), but this time you can orient it in space, and you need two angles to do this (one angle wouldn't be enough, since the orientation is in 3D). So it has 3+2 = 5 degrees of freedom.

Note that the previous example assumes that the distance between the atoms of the diatomic particle is fixed. If it's not, then we'd have an extra degree of freedom: the distance between them.
 
  • Like
Likes i_hate_math
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top