How Do You Calculate Eigenvalues for a 2x2 Symmetric Matrix?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ilikephysics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eigenvalues
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the eigenvalues of a 2x2 symmetric matrix A, the correct approach involves solving the quadratic equation derived from the determinant, specifically (a-λ)(c-λ) - b² = 0. The initial assumption that the eigenvalues can be directly equated to a-b and c-b is incorrect; instead, the quadratic formula should be used to find the eigenvalues. The discussion also highlights the importance of avoiding algebraic errors when working with eigenvalues and eigenvectors. The eigenvectors corresponding to the eigenvalues can be determined after correctly identifying the eigenvalues. Proper understanding of the quadratic equation is crucial for accurate calculations in linear algebra.
ilikephysics
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Find the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the general real symmetric 2 x 2 matrix A= a b
b c


The two eigenvalues that I got are a-b and c-b. I got these values from this:

(a-eigenvalue)(c-eigenvalue)-b^2=0
(a-eigenvalue)(c-eigenvalue) = b^2
(a-eigenvalue)= b = a-b
(c-eigenvalue)= b = c-b

Will there be 4 eigen values instead of the two that I have? Like, a-b and a+b and c-b and c+b?
I haven't gotten to the eigenvectors yet. I'll post what I have in a minute.

Thanks for your help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
eigenvectors

Are these the eigenvectors?

For a-b,

-1
c-a-b


For c-b,

a-c-b
1
 
For the eigenvalues, you can't quite perform one of the steps you did. It's an incorrect assumption that

a - r = b = c - r
where r is an eigenvalue.

You've got the right equation up until that point, i.e.,

(a-r)(c-r) - b^2 = 0

but this is a quadratic equation in the r variable. Solve it the way you would normally solve a quadratic equation! Nothing too fancy.

cookiemonster
 
If you are working with eigenvalues and eigenvectors it would be a really, really good idea not to mess up basic algebra!

You have:
(a-eigenvalue)(c-eigenvalue) = b^2
(a-eigenvalue)= b = a-b
(c-eigenvalue)= b = c-b

You appear to be thinking that if xy= b^2, then x= b and y= b.

That is not at all true! (9*1= 32;5*(9/5)= 32, etc.)

Once you have the equation (a-eigenvalue)(c-eigenvalue) = b^2

(I'm going to use λ for the eigenvalue)

(a- &lamda;)(c-&lamba;)- b2= 0
λ2-(a+c)&lambda+ (ac- b2)= 0

Now you can use the quadratic formula to solve for the two values of λ
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top