How Do You Calculate Magnetization in an Iron Alloy Solenoid?

howdoIphysics
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hey I'm new here so I don't know if this is the right forum, but from what I could see this was the most relevant.

Homework Statement



A long solenoid with 50 turns per cm carries a current of 0.2 A. The solenoid is filled with an iron
alloy. The magnetic field B inside the iron alloy is measured to be 1.58 T acting parallel to the axis of
the solenoid.

Calculate the:
i) size of the applied field Bapp;
ii) size of the magnetization M in the iron alloy;

Homework Equations



This is my problem really as I don't know so far I've been using the magnetic field of a solenoid = (N/L)
*I*μ0, however I don't know if this correct or if it needs the permeability of the core to produce an accurate value.
I've also been using Bt= Bapp0*M rearranged to M= (Bt-Bapp)/μ0 to answer the second question.

The Attempt at a Solution



Well this is just plugging numbers into the equations so I'm confident that I haven't done anything wrong here.
Assuming the solenoid field is Bapp, Bapp=5000*0.2*1.3×10−6 = 0.0013.
Putting that into the rearranged equation. M = (1.58 - 0.0013)/1.3×10−6 = 1.2106.

My problem here is those values seem very small and ridiculously large respectively, have I done something wrong or am looking for errors where there are none?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
hey, welcome to physicsforums! uh, your answers look good to me. Although when you hand in your work, you should probably give units, and maybe be a bit more careful on the rounding-off. But it's essentially good. And yes, one is very large and the other is very small. But this is just because SI units are like that. Looking at your equation M= (Bt-Bapp)/μ0 And since μ0 is very small in SI units, the ratio between Bt-Bapp and M will always be an 'extreme' ratio, in SI units.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top