How Do You Calculate Moles of Gas and CO2 Concentration Using the Ideal Gas Law?

AI Thread Summary
The Ideal Gas Law can be utilized to calculate the number of moles of gas in a specific volume at given conditions, such as 1.00 atm and 298K. In a scenario involving 6.0 x 10^2 mL of a 1.0 x 10^-4 M NaOH solution with phenolphthalein, the reaction with CO2 can be analyzed to determine the concentration of CO2 in a person's breath. When 374 mL of breath is needed to change the indicator from pink to colorless, this data can be used to calculate the moles of CO2 present. The calculations involve using the molarity of the NaOH solution and the volume of breath to find the concentration of CO2. Understanding these principles is essential for accurate gas concentration measurements in various applications.
ANIMAL who
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
#1-Use the Ideal Gas Law to calculate the number of moles of gas at 1.00atm in a cell 10.0cm long having a cross sectional area of 1.00cm^2 at 298K. (1ml=1cm^3)


#2-Lets say you start with 6.0 x 10^2 mL of 1.0 x 10^-4 M NaOH solution containing phenolphthalein indicator. The equation is CO_2 + OH^- yields HCO^-_3 (HCO bottom number of three with an overall negative charge) If 374 mL of a persons breath is required to turn the phenolphthalein from pink to colorless, calculate the number of moles of CO_2 per L of breath (ie., the concentration of CO_2) in this breath.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ANIMAL who said:
#1-Use the Ideal Gas Law to calculate the number of moles of gas at 1.00atm in a cell 10.0cm long having a cross sectional area of 1.00cm^2 at 298K. (1ml=1cm^3)


#2-Lets say you start with 6.0 x 10^2 mL of 1.0 x 10^-4 M NaOH solution containing phenolphthalein indicator. The equation is CO_2 + OH^- yields HCO^-_3 (HCO bottom number of three with an overall negative charge) If 374 mL of a persons breath is required to turn the phenolphthalein from pink to colorless, calculate the number of moles of CO_2 per L of breath (ie., the concentration of CO_2) in this breath.

Show us what you have so far, Animal.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top