How Do You Calculate Shear Force and Bending Moments in Stub Axles?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jonny2k
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Axle Calculations
AI Thread Summary
To calculate shear force and bending moments in stub axles, it's essential to understand that the shear force remains constant between the point of load application and the reaction point. The bending moment varies linearly from the load to the reaction point, calculated as force multiplied by distance. The geometry of the axle affects internal stress distribution, but does not change the shear force along the length of the axle. Each section between the load and reaction experiences the same shear force, while shear stress will vary based on cross-sectional area. Focus on drawing the shear force diagram, as it is distinct from the shear stress diagram.
jonny2k
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
i have been set a question to draw the shear force and bending moment diagrams for the loading condition shown on the diagram, and am not quite sure how to do this...

do i need to work out other forces along the diagram?

and help...much appriciated thanks!
 

Attachments

Engineering news on Phys.org
This is a basic cantilever beam with a point load.
The shear force will be the same between the point of application of the load and the reaction to the load. The bending moment (force x length) will vary linearly with the distance from the load to the reaction to the load. The axle's variable geometry (indicating a non-prismatic beam) effects the distribution of internal stresses. The load diagrams are determined only by the nature of the loads (point, distributed, etc.) and the position and nature of the supports (free, pinned, fixed).

Chris

jonny2k said:
i have been set a question to draw the shear force and bending moment diagrams for the loading condition shown on the diagram, and am not quite sure how to do this...

do i need to work out other forces along the diagram?

and help...much appriciated thanks!
 
with the axle fixed on the right hand side does this mean the only shear force is where the force is acting (in the centre of the 3rd block)?
 
jonny2k said:
with the axle fixed on the right hand side does this mean the only shear force is where the force is acting (in the centre of the 3rd block)?

No. The shear force is acting on every arbitrary section between the point of application of the force and the reaction to the force at the right hand side. It's not just at the point of application of the load.

Chris
 
so the force acting on each section is different? this is what's confusing me i think! how do i work out the different forces say at 6 points along the axle...
 
jonny2k said:
so the force acting on each section is different? this is what's confusing me i think! how do i work out the different forces say at 6 points along the axle...

The shear force acting on each of the six points is the same. It is the same at any point on the axle between the point of application of the force and the point of resistance (reaction) to the force. You're imagining that the six points where the geometry changes have a special significance in regard to the shear force when they don't. The shear stress in the axle referenced along it's length does vary according to the cross sectional area at each point of interest. The geometry does come into play when looking at stress (force /area). If you had to draw the shear stress diagram then your concerns would have merit...but you're not being asked to draw the shear stress diagram. You're being asked to draw the shear force diagram. The shear force is constant and equal to the applied load at every possible vertical cut you might make in the axle between the point where the load is applied and the point where the load is resisted at the right hand end.

Chris
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top