How Do You Calculate the Coefficient of Kinetic Friction on a Sled?

  • Thread starter Thread starter NewsboysGurl91
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces Friction
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the coefficient of kinetic friction on a sled being pulled up a hill, the sled's weight and the pulling force must be accurately represented in the free body diagram. The sled weighs 60N, and the pulling force of 25N must be included in the calculations for the normal force. The correct approach involves determining the normal force by accounting for both the weight and the pulling force's components. The initial calculations led to confusion, particularly regarding the normal force and frictional force, resulting in an incorrect coefficient of kinetic friction. Adjusting the calculations by properly incorporating all forces will yield the correct coefficient, which is stated to be 0.161 in the reference material.
NewsboysGurl91
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
1. A boy drags his 60.0N sled at constant speed up a 15 degree hill. He does so by pulling with a 25.0-N force on a rope attached to the sled.If the rope is inclined at 35.0 degrees to the horizantal, (a) what is the coefficient of kinetic friction between sled and snow? (b) At the top of the hill, he jumps on the sled and slides down the hill. What is the magnitude of his acceleration down the slope?



2. uk = fk/ fn, F=ma, Fkinetic = ukN (ukmg)

http://files.tagworld.com/1b8d4ad5e8f8420aa647e517a48eef7e.jpeg That is my free body diagram.

3. Okay so I said 60N = mg cos 15 so that I would get m. Plugging in 10 for g (because of gravity), I found that the mass of the block was 6.211657082. I have no idea if that's right or not.

But I went on saying that Fn = mgcos15 - Ncos 15. I plugged in 6.21 for m, 9.8 for g, and 60 for N (Is that correct?). I got .84445 N.

Then to find fk, I found out it was equal to mgsin15 - Tsin15. Again, I plugged in the numebrs for m, g, and N, the same as before. I got that fk is .22629698076 N.

To get the coefficient of kinetic friction, I divided fk/fn, using the values I got. However, my answer was .2 something. The book says the answer is supposed to be .161. I totally have no clue as to this problem so that I would get the correct answer. Can someone help me?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The force of 60N that you have on your diagram should not be there. 60N is the weight of the sled, and so that should be in place of "mg" in your free body diagram. Then, the parallel and perpendicular components of the weight are 60sin15 and 60cos15, respectively. Try adjusting this and see what you get.
 
So what you're saying to do is Fn= 60cos15 - 60cos15 ? Then the answer is automatically 0 or undefined.
 
NewsboysGurl91 said:
So what you're saying to do is Fn= 60cos15 - 60cos15 ? Then the answer is automatically 0 or undefined.

No.. you have another force in the free body diagram, namely the pulling force of 25N. So, your normal contact force will have contributions from both the weight of the sled and the pulling force.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top