How Do You Calculate the Correct Heading for an Airplane in Wind?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the correct heading for an airplane flying from point A to point B in wind conditions, the wind is blowing N 75 degrees E at 96 km/h, while the plane has an airspeed of 320 km/h. The destination B is located S 40 degrees W of A, which requires determining the plane's heading to compensate for the wind's effect. Participants suggest using vector components to solve the problem, emphasizing the need to break down the vectors into x and y components. The discussion also mentions the parallelogram theory as a potential method for visualizing the vectors involved. Overall, understanding the relationship between the wind vector and the desired flight path is crucial for finding the correct heading.
byronsakic
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
The wind is blowing N 75 degrees East at 96 km/h. A plane is flying with air speed 320 km/h. Find the heading the plane must have in order to get from A to B, if B is S40 degrees W of A. Include a diagram in your solution.

Alright, i am totally lost.
Could someone please maybe put on some tips or who may know what to do in finding the heading of the plane?
If you could also add a diagram it would be great because this is probably a test question for Geometry. XD

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Last edited:
I get the same diagram, and angles the same.
 

Attachments

  • byron.gif
    byron.gif
    9.1 KB · Views: 608
Last edited:
alright thanks, the A to B part confused me, because i didnt know which part would be A and B lol..
 
bah i am actually now confused in why the 320 km/h or planes speed is the resultant vector. Wouldnt 320 km/h be the S 40 DEGREE W vector in the third quadrant?

is there anyone else who would think there would be an alternative way ? XD

my first approach would to think to use the parallelogram theory.
 
Last edited:
If 320 km/h was the S 40 degree W vector, the wind would blow the airplane off-target. That is why the airplane must "overaim". I'm not sure what is meant by parallelogram theory, but you should divide the vectors into x and y components.
 
yes, so if i divided it into x and y components, i would be using cartesian vectors right? instead of geometric vectors
 

Similar threads

Back
Top