How Do You Calculate the Decay Constant from Radioactivity Measurements?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the decay constant from radioactivity measurements, the initial activity of a radioactive isotope is 120 Bq, and after 1 hour and 55 minutes, it measures 85.8 Bq. The decay constant can be determined using the equation B0 * exp(-k * t) = B1, where B0 is the initial activity, B1 is the final activity, and t is the elapsed time. The decay constant (k) can also be related to the half-life using the formula k = ln(2) / t(half-life). Clarification is needed regarding the switch from k to lambda in the equations. Understanding the relationship between forces and potential energy in nuclear interactions is also raised but remains vague.
GTBuzz42
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A sample of radioactive isotope is found to
have an activity of 120 Bq imediately after it
is pulled from the reactor that formed the iso-
tope. Its activity 1 h 55 min later is measured
to be 85.8 Bq.
Find the decay constant of the sample. An-
swer in units of h^-1.


Homework Equations



1Bq= 1 decay/sec ln(2)/k= t(half-life)

The Attempt at a Solution



120-85.8/(115*60)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not even close. You'll also want the equation that B0*exp(-k*t)=B1, where B0 in the initial activity, B1 is the final activity, t is the time elapsed and k is the decay constant.
 
Then the half life should just be ln(2)/lambda?
 
That's what you've already said, isn't it? Except for some reason you switched k to lambda.
 
thanks

If I have solved for a Coulomb force between an alpha particle and a carbon nucleus, is there any relations that get to potential energy? I thought energy from that would just be Fr
 
GTBuzz42 said:
thanks

If I have solved for a Coulomb force between an alpha particle and a carbon nucleus, is there any relations that get to potential energy? I thought energy from that would just be Fr

That's pretty vague.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top