How Do You Calculate the Decay Constant from Radioactivity Measurements?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the decay constant from radioactivity measurements, the initial activity of a radioactive isotope is 120 Bq, and after 1 hour and 55 minutes, it measures 85.8 Bq. The decay constant can be determined using the equation B0 * exp(-k * t) = B1, where B0 is the initial activity, B1 is the final activity, and t is the elapsed time. The decay constant (k) can also be related to the half-life using the formula k = ln(2) / t(half-life). Clarification is needed regarding the switch from k to lambda in the equations. Understanding the relationship between forces and potential energy in nuclear interactions is also raised but remains vague.
GTBuzz42
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A sample of radioactive isotope is found to
have an activity of 120 Bq imediately after it
is pulled from the reactor that formed the iso-
tope. Its activity 1 h 55 min later is measured
to be 85.8 Bq.
Find the decay constant of the sample. An-
swer in units of h^-1.


Homework Equations



1Bq= 1 decay/sec ln(2)/k= t(half-life)

The Attempt at a Solution



120-85.8/(115*60)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not even close. You'll also want the equation that B0*exp(-k*t)=B1, where B0 in the initial activity, B1 is the final activity, t is the time elapsed and k is the decay constant.
 
Then the half life should just be ln(2)/lambda?
 
That's what you've already said, isn't it? Except for some reason you switched k to lambda.
 
thanks

If I have solved for a Coulomb force between an alpha particle and a carbon nucleus, is there any relations that get to potential energy? I thought energy from that would just be Fr
 
GTBuzz42 said:
thanks

If I have solved for a Coulomb force between an alpha particle and a carbon nucleus, is there any relations that get to potential energy? I thought energy from that would just be Fr

That's pretty vague.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top