How Do You Calculate Uncertainty in Stress Measurements?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the uncertainty in stress measurements, the formula σ = F/A is used, where σ is stress, F is force, and A is area. The uncertainties in force and area need to be treated as percentage uncertainties, which are added when multiplying or dividing quantities. For example, if the area is measured as 7.548E-08 with a 6.452% uncertainty and the force as 2 with a 25% uncertainty, the overall uncertainty in stress can be approximated by considering the extreme combinations of these values. However, using large uncertainties like 25% can lead to inaccurate results, so smaller percentages are recommended for better accuracy. Understanding the statistical principles behind uncertainty calculations is essential for precise measurements.
abray10
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



For my physics course work i need to work out the uncertainty of stress, is there formula for this or is it just the largest value of uncertainty

for example is my area is 7.548E-08 +/- 6.452% and my force 2 +/- 25%


Homework Equations



stress= Force/area

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried putting both the uncertaintys in the equation for stess so 6.452/25% but the uncertainty becomes far to small then
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I suggest that you try all four extreme combinations and just see what uncertainty you get. Try that first just for fun.

Then, consider this logic: I'm going to rewrite your equation as Stress = Force*Smallness where Smallness is something I just invented equal to 1/Area.

25% is too big for this to work accurately so I'll change it to 5%.

So if Area is 2 +/- 5%, what about Smallness? Area is 1.9 -> 2.1 so Smallness is 0.526 -> 0.476 which is near enough 0.5 +/- 0.025 which is 5%

So if the percentage uncertainty in X is Y then the percentage uncertainty in 1/X is also roughly Y.

So when you divide A by B you treat the percentage uncertainties just as you would if you'd multiplied them.

If you remember, you add the uncertainties when you multiply the quantities. If you don't, do what I said up top just for fun.

As for that 25% I had to tiptoe around, well indeed, this whole way of treating uncertainties is just a fairly bad approximation, and it fails badly at numbers like 25%. If you want to know the real deal, study statistics.

Adrian.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top