How Do You Correctly Calculate the Electric Field Under a Thundercloud?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the electric field under a thundercloud modeled as a vertical dipole, the configuration includes a +40C charge at 10km and a -40C charge at 6km. The electric field at the ground is derived from the contributions of both charges, but the initial calculation yields incorrect results. The correct formula for the electric field should include proper parentheses to ensure π and ε0 are in the denominator. The expected electric field strength is 12.8 kV/m directed upwards. Accurate attention to signs and magnitudes in the calculation is crucial for obtaining the correct result.
nathangrand
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
The electrical system of typical thundercloud can be represented by a vertical dipole consisting of a charge of +40C at a height of 10km and a charge of -40C vertically below it at a height of 6km. What is the electric field at the ground directly beneath the thundercloud.

I am simply adding the the field from each point charge at the ground together but get the wrong answer...any suggestions?

Eground= 40/4*∏*ε0(1/10000^2 - 1/6000^2)

Answer should be 12.8KV/m upwards
 
Physics news on Phys.org
At the point on the ground, where you are calculating the E field:
What is the direction of the E field due to a positive charge which is above?

What is the direction of the E field due to a negative charge which is above?
 
+ve into ground, -ve charge field up?
 
Yes. Now look at the signs you have in your calculation.
 
A sign error isn't my problem - it's the magnitude I get wrong...
 
nathangrand said:
Eground= 40/4*∏*ε0(1/10000^2 - 1/6000^2)

Place proper parentheses so the π and ε0 are in the denominator.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top