How Do You Set Up Equations to Find Currents in a Circuit?

  • Thread starter Thread starter theuniverse
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit Currents
AI Thread Summary
To find the currents I1-I6 in the circuit, equations for nodes and loops were established. The node equations include I_2 - I_6 - I_3 = 0, I_3 + I_5 - I_1 = 0, and I_1 - I_4 - I_2 = 0. Loop equations should be formatted correctly with an equals sign, such as -V_1 + I_1(R_3 + R_1) + V_2 + I_5R_2 = 0. It was noted that R3 must be treated like other resistors, and the identification of nodes a and d was corrected. Properly setting up these equations is crucial for accurately determining the circuit currents.
theuniverse
Messages
53
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find currents I1-I6. I'm really looking only for the equations though...


Homework Equations


V=IR


The Attempt at a Solution


I tried to set up equations for the nodes and loops:
Node a:I_2-I_6-I_3=0
Node b: I_3+I_5-I_1=0
Node d: I_1-I_4-I_2=0

Loop 1: -V_1+I_1R_1+V_2+I_5R_2
Loop 2: -V_2+I_2R_5+I_6R_4
Loop 3: I_3R_6-I_5R_2-I_6R_4

I'm pretty sure that the above equations are not correct since I was not sure how to incorporate R3 and I am also a little bit confused about how to relate I1 and I2 and I4.

Thanks for the help!
 

Attachments

  • circuit.jpg
    circuit.jpg
    12.8 KB · Views: 477
Physics news on Phys.org
Your node current equations look fine, except that you seem to have interchanged nodes a and d.

For your loops, they need to be in the form of equations (there should be an "=" in there somewhere). For loop 1, treat R3 as you did the other resistors; there's a voltage drop across R3 due to the loop current i1 flowing through it.
 
Yeah I meant to equal all the loops to 0. How about this:
Loop 1: -V_1+I_1(R_3+R_1)+V_2+I_5R_2=0
And you are right about the nodes a and d.. They are switched in my diagram on paper.. thanks!
 
theuniverse said:
Yeah I meant to equal all the loops to 0. How about this:
Loop 1: -V_1+I_1(R_3+R_1)+V_2+I_5R_2=0
Yup. That looks okay.
And you are right about the nodes a and d.. They are switched in my diagram on paper.. thanks!
You're welcome :smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top