How Do You Solve a Quantum Mechanics Problem in a 1D Infinite Square Well?

meow123
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A particle of mass m is in a one-dimensional infinite square well that extends from x = –a to x = a.



a) Find the energy eigenfunctions ψn (x) and corresponding eigenvalues En of this particle. (Hint: you may use the results of the book for an infinite square well between x=0 and x=a, appropriately modified!)

b) The parity operator Π is defined as: Π ψ(x) = ψ (–x) for any function ψ(x). Does Π commute with the Hamiltonian H of this particle?

c) Are the energy eigenfunctions ψn (x) also eigenfunctions of Π and, if yes, with what eigenvalue each?



The wavefunction of the particle at some initial time is ψ = C sin |πx/a| , with C a real positive constant. ( ψ = 0 for |x| > a )



d) Normailize the wavefunction by calculating the appropriate value of C.

e) Calculate the expectation value of the energy of this particle.

f) Is the above wavefunction an eigenfunction of Π and, if yes, with what eigenvalue?

g) What is the probability that a measurement of the energy of this particle will yield the value E2 ? (Hint: the result of (c) and (f) may help you.)

Can anyone help me with this? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi.

I would like to help you, but please give it a try first, then we can look at it together.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top