How Do You Solve Complex Physics Problems Involving Newton's Laws?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving complex physics problems using Newton's laws, specifically involving a sailboat and a bird on a telephone wire. For the sailboat, the user is trying to calculate the resultant acceleration by resolving forces into components and applying the formula Fnet = ma, ultimately finding an acceleration of 3.4 m/s². The second problem involves determining the tension in a wire sagging due to a bird's weight, where the user correctly calculates the hypotenuse but needs guidance on finding the angle and tension. The solution involves using trigonometric relationships and free body diagrams to analyze the forces acting on the system. Overall, the thread emphasizes the importance of proper diagramming and component analysis in solving physics problems.
bigslowy
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
These problems are really giving me fits, I would really appreciate some help.

A 12200 kg sailboat experiences an eastward
force of 27400 N due to tide pushing its hull
while the wind pushes the sails with a force of
56200 N directed toward the northwest (45±
westward of North or 45± northward ofWest).
What is the magnitude of the resultant ac-
celeration of the sailboat?



I'm using Fr= square root of (Frx squared)+(Fry squared) but I'm still not getting it right. I'm thinking that maybe I drew the free body diagram wrong. Any help?

Now for this one

The distance between two telephone poles is
32 m. When a 1:15 kg bird lands on the
telephone wire midway between the poles, the
wire sags 0:182 m.
The acceleration of gravity is 9:8 m=s2 :
How much tension in the wire does the
bird produce? Ignore the weight of the wire.

So far I've drawn the diagram and got a hypotenuse of 16.001 m, but I'm unsure how to finish the problem.

Any help would be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. Find the magnitude using the cosine law.
2. use F=ma to find the magnitude of a.
It is easier to use the unit vector i and j. but i am afraid you haven't learned that yet. so we will approach it geometrically.
 

Attachments

  • Picture.GIF
    Picture.GIF
    1.9 KB · Views: 584
First problem (sail boat)

check the attachment

Fx = F(east) - F(northwest)Xcos45 = -12339 N
Fy = F(northwest)Xsin45 = 39739 N
Fnet = Squareroot of (Fx^2 + Fy^2)
then, Fnet = ma
a = Fnet/mass = 3.4 m/s
 

Attachments

  • sailboat problem.JPG
    sailboat problem.JPG
    3 KB · Views: 555
2nd problem

ok the hyp that you got is good.
a^2 + b^2 = c^2
a= 16
b = .182
c = 16.001 using the formula. Good you got until this point.

2nd step= get the angle theta. (see diagram)

90-tan (16/.182) = theta


step 3 = Get the tension by adding the Forces on the y axes. See diagram
 

Attachments

  • 2nd problem.JPG
    2nd problem.JPG
    5.5 KB · Views: 498
Free body diagram : Attached file.
 

Attachments

  • Picture.GIF
    Picture.GIF
    2.3 KB · Views: 577
of course, I didn't draw the other tension on the other side because is understood.
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top