How Does a Calorimeter's Composition Impact Heat Transfer Calculations?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the specific heat of an unknown metallic block placed in an aluminum calorimeter containing water. It emphasizes that the calorimeter's composition, specifically being aluminum, must be included in heat transfer calculations as it affects the overall energy balance. The equation Q(calorimeter) + Q(water) = Q(Block 1) + Q(Block 2) is confirmed as appropriate for solving the problem, considering the heat gained by the calorimeter and water against the heat lost by the metallic blocks. Participants clarify that known masses and specific heats of the water and copper are essential for the calculations. The final temperature of 20 degrees Celsius indicates that the calorimeter and water gain heat while the blocks lose heat, guiding the calculation of the unknown specific heat.
mirandasatterley
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
"An aluminum calorimeter with a mass of 100g contains 250g of water. The calorimeter and water are in thermal equilibrium at 10.0Degree C. Two metalic blocks are placed into the water. One is a 50g piece of copper at 80.0 degree C. The other block has a mass of 70.0g and is origionally at a temperature of 100degree C. the entire system stabalizes at a final temerature of 20degree C. Determine the specific heat of the unknown sample.

I know that for general cases;
Q(water) = -Q(x) Where x is the substance put into the water
mcdeltaT(water) = - mcdeltaT(x)

My first question is: Does the fact that the calorimeter is made of aluminum affect the Q(calorimeter) part, which is Q(water) in my previous equation? If it does, any hints on how. I think I have to add the masses, but I am unsure about the specific heat part.

My other question is: How do I deal with two objects being put into the water?

Any help is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The aluminum warms up with the rest of the system. You will need to include it in your heat transferr calculations.
 
mirandasatterley said:
"An aluminum calorimeter with a mass of 100g contains 250g of water. The calorimeter and water are in thermal equilibrium at 10.0Degree C. Two metalic blocks are placed into the water. One is a 50g piece of copper at 80.0 degree C. The other block has a mass of 70.0g and is origionally at a temperature of 100degree C. the entire system stabalizes at a final temerature of 20degree C. Determine the specific heat of the unknown sample.

How do I deal with two objects being put into the water?QUOTE]
 
mirandasatterley said:
How do I deal with two objects being put into the water?
The water, copper, and aluminum have known masses and specific heats (you may have to look them up). The only unknown is the specific heat of the unknown sample.
 
Last edited:
OlderDan said:
The water, copper, and aluminum have known masses and specific heats (you may have to look them up). The only unknown is the specific heat of the unknown sample.

Can i use the equation;

Q(calorimeter) + Q(water) = Q(Block 1) + Q(Block 2)

Then solve for the specific heat capacity of block 2?
Is it correct to add them like This?
 
mirandasatterley said:
Can i use the equation;

Q(calorimeter) + Q(water) = Q(Block 1) + Q(Block 2)

Then solve for the specific heat capacity of block 2?
Is it correct to add them like This?

Yes. Since the final temperature attained is 20 deg C, the calorimeter and water gains heat energy while the 2 blocks lose energy.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top