How does a frictionless metal bar generate current on conducting rails?

mathnerd15
Messages
109
Reaction score
0
I'm not taking this course for credit...

Hi! Is this a good text after Halliday?
I'm trying problem 7.7-
a metal bar of mass m slides frictionlessly on 2 conducting rails...
perhaps the current is I=integral J dot da, generated by the moving metal bar, velocity v (results in changing reference frame and B field which results in EMF driving current vertically up through the wire?) is the force diagram similar to 7.11?
I'm unclear on the geometry of the force digram?

thanks very much
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm curious at what point does a great physicist have the intuition for these problems- is it something that you are born with?
 
Do you know how to find the magnetic force on a stationary wire that is carrying current?
I wouldn't think about current density in a problem like this; it is intuitive to me that the total current through the bar is what matters for the force, regardless of the cross sectional distribution of current density.
 
Biot-Savart law

thanks very much!
Isn't that the beautiful Biot-Savart law where muo is the permeability of free space? uo=4pi*10^-7N/A^2)
(muo/4pi)Integral[ (I X r )dl'/r^2 ]

there is the interesting situation of the Infinite Wire- theta1=-pi/2, theta2=pi/2B= muoI/(2pi s)
and as you know there is a form for surface and volume currents
I'm just starting to look at these...
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top