How does a norm differ from an absolute value?

dimensionless
Messages
460
Reaction score
1
How does a norm differ from an absolute value? For example, is

<br /> \|\mathbf{x}\| = \sqrt{x_1^2 + \cdots + x_n^2}<br />

any different than

<br /> |\mathbf{x}| = \sqrt{x_1^2 + \cdots + x_n^2}<br />

??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The usual absolute value satisfies all the properties of a norm- it's just the most common example of one. You've surely met other examples of norms though.
 
dimensionless said:
How does a norm differ from an absolute value? For example, is

<br /> \|\mathbf{x}\| = \sqrt{x_1^2 + \cdots + x_n^2}<br />

any different than

<br /> |\mathbf{x}| = \sqrt{x_1^2 + \cdots + x_n^2}<br />

??

What the norm is kind of depends on how you are defining the inner product. The example you have is for a normal dot product, but the norm for an inner product is the sqrt of the inner product...

A better definition
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/VectorNorm.html
 
Last edited:
Geekster said:
What the norm is kind of depends on how you are defining the inner product.

Every inner product leads to a norm, but not all norms come from an inner product.
 
Strictly speaking, the term "absolute value" is used only for numbers: real or complex. The term "norm" is used for vectors. The norm is exactly the same as what you are calling absolute value but I wouldn't use that term.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top