How Does a Particle Inside a Rolling Cylinder Affect Its Motion?

Azael
Messages
257
Reaction score
1
As in the attached picture.
A cylindrical shell with mass M can roll without gliding on a horizontal plane

In the cylindrical shell a particle ,p, with mass m can glide without friction.

At the beginning there is no motion and the angle to the particles position is \phi=\frac{\pi}{2}


I am suposed to find the movement of the center of the circle as a function of the angle \phi

Im not sure how I should start.

The potential energy of the system is, if I place the plane of reference on the level of the horizontal plane.

V=mgR(1-cos\phi)

Now this problem obviously only has one degree of freedom and that is the angle \phi

But if I want to construct a lagrangian I must use two degres of freedom. The rotation angle of the cylinder \alpha and the angle to the particle p \phi. Because I don't know how \alpha and \phi are connected. Is this the correct thinking?

In that manner I get this equation

L=T-V=\frac{3}{4}MR^2\dot{\alpha}^2+\frac{1}{2}m[\dot{\alpha}^2 R^2 + R^2\dot{\phi}^2 + \dot{\alpha}^2 R^2 sin\phi ] - mgR(1-cos\phi )

Should I use this and solve the two lagrande equations

\frac {d}{dt} \frac{dL}{d\dot{\alpha}}-\frac{dL}{d\alpha}=0

\frac {d}{dt} \frac{dL}{d\dot{\phi}}-\frac{dL}{d\phi}=0

Im not sure if this will give me any answere though? It feels like I should express \alpha in \phi before I even do the lagrangian. Am I on the right track?
 

Attachments

  • boll.JPG
    boll.JPG
    3.8 KB · Views: 488
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I assume that I in the same manner can get the hamiltonian since its a conservative force situation and holonomic constrains.

H=T+V=\frac{3}{4}MR^2\dot{\alpha}^2+\frac{1}{2}m[\dot{\alpha}^2 R^2 + R^2\dot{\phi}^2 + \dot{\alpha}^2 R^2 sin\phi ] + mgR(1-cos\phi )

But I am not quite sure what I would do with that one either. I know that

\dot{\alpha}=\frac{dH}{dP_{\alpha}}
and
-\dot{P_{\alpha}}=\frac{dH}{d\alpha}

But that doesn't seem to be much help either??
 
Last edited:
I don't know...I wish I could help...

It seems like you really do need two generalized coordinates. I mean, the particle is free to move; it doesn't seem like it is constrained in any way such that \phi and \alpha would be related.
 
I think that there is an error in your Lagrangian: Since you are interested in the movement of the cylinder and watch it in the "labatory system", so to say, you can't say that the velocity of the particle in y-direction is R \dot \phi \cos(\phi). \phi is fixed in the "cylinder system", so you have you add the y-velocity of the cylinder. If you square this, you should get a "mixed term" so that the both velocities are related.
 
Last edited:
I managed to solve it. my expression for the Y position of the particle was

Rsin\phi + R\alpha

So velocity was

R\dot{\phi}cos\phi + R\dot{\alpha}

I used the fact that the conjugated momentum is constant for the alpha coordinate since there is no alpha, just alpha dot, dependence :) tricky problem.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top