How Does Air Resistance Affect the Distance of Free Fall?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the distance a particle falls under the influence of gravity and air resistance, modeled as a force proportional to the square of the velocity. The user starts with the equation of motion m(dv/dt) = -mg - kmv² and attempts to integrate it, leading to a complex function involving the inverse tangent. They seek clarification on whether a second integration is necessary to find the distance fallen. A suggestion is made to use the relation \ddot{x} = v(dv/dx) to simplify the problem and achieve the correct distance formula. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying integration techniques in physics problems involving resistance.
eku_girl83
Messages
89
Reaction score
0
Here's the problem:
Consider a particle of mass m whose motion starts from rest in a constant gravitational field. If a resisting force proportional to the square of the velocity (kmv2) is encountered, find the distance s the particle falls in accelerating from v0 to v1.

I began with the equation m (dv/dt)=-mg-kmv2.
From this, we see that dv = -g-kv2 dt.
When I separate variables and integrate this however, I get a function that involves the inverse tangent. I would have to integrate a second time to find distance, correct?
The book gives the distance s from v0 to v1 as 1/2k ln ((g-kv02)/(g-kv12)). What am I doing wrong?

Any help greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use the relation

<br /> \ddot{x} = v \frac{dv}{dx}<br />

on the left hand side of your equation and you should find things work out :)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top