How Does an Electric Field Affect the Quantum Harmonic Oscillator?

ehrenfest
Messages
2,001
Reaction score
1
[SOLVED] QM simple harmonic oscillator

Homework Statement


If I have a particle in an SHO potential and an electric field, I can represent its potential as:

V(x) = 0.5 * m \omega^2 (x - \frac{qE}{mw^2})^2 - \frac{1}{2m}(\frac{qE}{\omega})^2

I know the solutions to the TISE:

-\hbar^2 /2m \frac{d^2 \psi}{ dx^2} + 0.5 m\omege^2 x^2\psi(x) = E\psi(x) (*)

(Those are different Es)So, I plug V(x) into the TISE and get:

-\hbar^2 /2m \frac{d^2 \psi}{ dx^2} + (0.5 * m \omega^2 (x - \frac{qE}{mw^2})^2 - \frac{1}{2m}(\frac{qE}{\omega})^2) \psi(x) = E\psi(x)Now, since we only shift and translated the potential, I should be able to find a substitution for x that yields the equation (*) in a new variable y = f(x), right?
The problem is, after I move the constant term to the RHS, I cannot find the right substitution. What am I doing wrong?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think that I can even prove that there is no constant that you can add to x to find a suitable substitution. Something must be wrong here?
 
Have you tried the obvious substitution: \xi = x-qE/m\omega ^2 ~ ?

You can ignore the additive constant and refer all energies relative to that value.
 
Yes, I figured it out. The problem was that I was under the false impression that I had to substitute epsilon for every x in that equation, which does not work.

I realized, however, that you can substitute for psi(x) separately since it is a factor on both sides of the equation.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top