How Does an Electron Move in Non-Uniform Magnetostatic Fields?

Fernando Mourao
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Describe semiquantitatively the motion of an electron under the presence
of a constant electric field in the x direction,
E =E0x^
and a space varying magnetic field given by
B = B0 a(x + z)x^ + B0 [1 + a(x - z)]z^
where Eo, Bo, and a are positive constants, lαxl « 1 and lαzl « 1.
Assume that initially the electron moves with constant velocity in the
z direction, v(t = 0) = v0z^. Verify if t his magnetic field satisfies the
Maxwell equation ∇ x B = 0

Homework Equations


[/B]
Equation of motion:
m dv/dt = q[E + v × B]

The Attempt at a Solution


I've proven that the B field satisfies the Maxwell equation.

and considering B(0,0,0) = B0 z^
I got the B field as a first order approximation about the origin as
B(r) = B0z^ + (B0αx + B0αz)x^ + (B0αx - B0αz )z^

So from the equation of motion I get:
m dv/dt = q[E + v × B] = q[E + v × B0 + v×[r⋅∇B]]

The first two terms on the right hand side show that the particle would have a uniform acceleration along the x direction and a circular motion (varying with the instantaneous velocity) with x and y components; the last term is a force term and results in a combined gradient-curvature drift of the particle.

I feel like I'm missing something regarding the divergent term of ∇B. How far should i go with the resolution of the equation of motion?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are only asked for "describe semi-quantitatively" - so that is as far as you go.
You have not been asked for the motion close to the origin, or even for a short time ... so you will need to justify the approximation(s?) you used.
OTOH: the description says to assume an initial constant velocity ... which is not possible without some other applied forces, so it is not clear how the velocity at t<0 is important... this also makes it a bit tricky to assess what the question is asking for. You'll have to use the context of the recent coursework to guide you.
I would have interpreted it a bit like being asked to sketch a function ... I'd look for turning points, inflexions, and asymptotes, and an indication of the kind of curve between ... or their motion analogues.

I'm not sure any part of the motion is best described as "circular" ... but I suspect you should try to be more specific about the directions of deflections from the initial direction of travel. Once deflected, check if the direction of the force changes.

Note: best practise to use LaTeX markup in PF... so you have:
##\vec B = aB_0(x+z)\hat x + bB_0(x-z)\hat y## and ##\vec E = E_0\hat x##
##m \ddot{\vec r} = q\vec E+ q\dot{\vec r} \times \vec B : \vec r = x(t)\hat x + y(t)\hat y + z(t)\hat z##
 
  • Like
Likes Fernando Mourao
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top