How Does Angular Velocity Influence Particle Motion in Rotational Dynamics?

ensten
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
A particle of mass m is inside a long, narrow tube which rotates
a constant angular velocity ω in the horizontal plane. (This means that you see the tube
from the top of the figure and not from the side.) At time t = 0 is the particle on the radial distance a from the rotational axis and the radial velocity is zero. Then begins the slide without friction. Determine the particle radial distance from the rotation axis and the horizontal normal force of the particle from the tube functions
of the time!Why is equation (10) found in this solution https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/12645136/Losningar.pdf equal to 0?

If the particle moves from the center outwards isn't a force acting upon it in the radial direction? Hence giving it an acceleration in the same direction?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I will write this in English since it is public, PM me if you would perfer an explanation in Swedish:

No, assuming you solve this in a fixed coordinate system, there is no force acting in the radial direction (there simply is nothing to provide such a force). The reason you will have acceleration in the radial direction is that you use curvilinear coordinates, resulting in that a velocity in the tangential direction is translated into a radial component as the particle moves. This is described by the ##r\dot\theta^2## term in the radial equation.

If you instead chose to use a rotating coordinate system, the very same term will be provided by the centrifugal effect and you end up with the same equation. The tangential force will now be balanced by the Coriolis effect.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top