How Does Biot-Savart Law Calculate Magnetic Field at Point P?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the net magnetic field at point P due to two long straight wires carrying a current of 3.19 A. Using Biot-Savart's Law, the participants derive the magnetic field equations, noting the importance of considering both the vertical and horizontal components of the magnetic fields. It is clarified that the magnetic fields from each wire do not point in the same direction, with one field directed upwards and the other having both upward and downward components. The correct visualization of the magnetic field directions is emphasized to ensure accurate calculations. The final magnetic field magnitude calculated is approximately 1.7695e-07 T.
Sho Kano
Messages
372
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


The figure shows two very long straight wires (in cross section) that each carry a current of 3.19 A directly out of the page. Distance d1 = 6.00 m and distance d2 = 4.00 m. What is the magnitude of the net magnetic field at point P, which lies on a perpendicular bisector to the wires?
HW9Q7.png

Homework Equations


Biot-Savart's Law

The Attempt at a Solution


{ B }_{ long,\quad straight\quad wire }\quad =\quad \frac { { \mu }_{ 0 }I }{ 2\pi r } \\ r\quad =\quad \sqrt { { (\frac { { d }_{ 1 } }{ 2 } ) }^{ 2 }\quad +\quad { { d }_{ 2 } }^{ 2 } } \\ { B }_{ total }\quad =\quad 2B\quad =\quad \frac { { \mu }_{ 0 }I }{ \pi r } \\ { B }_{ total }\quad =\quad 1.7695e-07

I'm aware that I'm missing a sin(theta) in my multiplication, but why would I need to only specify a vertical component? The magnitude isn't only the vertical component.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the direction of B for each current?
 
TSny said:
What is the direction of B for each current?
Both act upwards on the point
 
The two fields at P are not in the same direction.
 
TSny said:
The two fields at P are not in the same direction.
Is this what you're visualizing:
Upper field points in the positive x and y direction
Lower field points in the negative x but positive y direction
?
 
Yes.
 
TSny said:
Yes.
Alright that makes sense now to put the y component in. I was visualizing both fields pointing up at the same time, but that's not possible at all with the orientation of the field.
 
OK.
 
Back
Top