How Does Changing Coordinates Affect the Momentum Space Wavefunction?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ehrenfest
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Change Coordinates
ehrenfest
Messages
2,001
Reaction score
1
For a wavefunction given by

\psi(x,t) = \sum a_n u_n(x) exp(-i E_n T/\hbar) how would you show that a change of coordinates x > x + d does not affect the momentum space wavefunction phi(x) by more than a phase change?
You get phi(x) by Fourier transforming psi.
So, I do not see why it would affect psi at all because you are moving the origin d to the left but you are integrating over all pace in the Fourier transform.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ehrenfest said:
For a wavefunction given by

\psi(x,t) = \sum a_n u_n(x) exp(-i E_n T/\hbar) how would you show that a change of coordinates x > x + d does not affect the momentum space wavefunction phi(x) by more than a phase change?
You get phi(x) by Fourier transforming psi.
So, I do not see why it would affect psi at all because you are moving the origin d to the left but you are integrating over all pace in the Fourier transform.

You mean we get phi(p) when doing Fourier transformation with respect to p. How is E related to p? Have you tried doing the mathematics or are you just trying to solve it by looking at it? =P
 
ehrenfest said:
So, I do not see why it would affect psi at all because you are moving the origin d to the left but you are integrating over all pace in the Fourier transform.

What you are saying exactly is not clear. Do you want to show that for two functions (of 'x') f and g and their Fourier transforms (functions of 'p') F and G, if f and g obey

<br /> g(x)=f(x+a)<br />

then F and G obey

<br /> G(p)=e^{ipa}F(p)\;.<br />

Is this what you want to show?
 
olgranpappy said:
What you are saying exactly is not clear. Do you want to show that for two functions (of 'x') f and g and their Fourier transforms (functions of 'p') F and G, if f and g obey

<br /> g(x)=f(x+a)<br />

then F and G obey

<br /> G(p)=e^{ipa}F(p)\;.<br />

Is this what you want to show?
Exactly! That F and G only differ by a phase factor (so their moduli squared are the same).
<br /> \phi(p,t) <br /> = \int\psi(x+d,t) e^{-i p x/ \hbar}dx <br /> = \int\psi(u,t) e^{-i p (u - d)/ \hbar}du<br /> =e^{i p d/ \hbar} \int\psi(u,t) e^{-i p u/ \hbar}du

I think that rephrasing of the question helped me finish it!
 
Last edited:
ehrenfest said:
I think that rephrasing of the question helped me finish it!

I'm glad. Good luck w/ the rest of your work.
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top