How Does Charge Distribution Affect Electric Field and Work Done?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on using Gauss' Law to determine the electric field produced by a uniformly distributed charge along the x-axis and calculating the work done on a charge Q moving along the y-axis. Participants clarify the relationship between charge density, electric field, and electric flux, emphasizing the importance of symmetry in selecting an appropriate Gaussian surface for calculations. The conversation highlights the need for understanding the direction of electric field lines and how they interact with the charge Q, particularly regarding the effects of positive and negative charges. It is noted that Gauss' Law applies effectively in cases of cylindrical, spherical, or planar symmetry. The thread concludes with a reminder that while Gauss' Law is universally applicable, its practical use for finding electric fields is limited to specific symmetrical situations.
uchicago2012
Messages
74
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Charge is uniformly distributed along the x-axis with density ß. Use Gauss' Law to find the electric field it produces, and use this to calculate the work done on a charge Q that moves along the y-axis from y = a to y = b.

Homework Equations


Gauss' Law: e0 * electric flux = qencl
where e0 is epsilon0

The Attempt at a Solution


I thought dq = Bdx
q = B integral (x)
= (Bx2)/2
Then if we say EA = qencl/eo
where E is the electric field and A is the area
The areas wind up canceling and I got
E = B/e0
But I'm not sure that's right at all. Particularly since I can't see how I use this electric field to calculate the work done on a charge Q that moves along the x axis. Wouldn't I have to know if the charges were positive or negative? Because presumably opposite charges would cause the charge Q to speed up as it approaches the x-axis while same would cause it to slow down... or am I on the wrong track completely?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
uchicago2012 said:
I thought dq = Bdx
That sounds reasonable to me. :approve:
q = B integral (x)
Wait, where did the x come from? And what happened to your dx? :wink:
 
Oh, I see. So I've found the charge, then Q = Bx. But then how do I go about finding the electric field? I can find the flux by dividing by e0 of course. But the flux = integral (flux * dA) which I'm not sure applies to this problem. Or I can say flux = E*A, which I've seen my book randomly do but I don't know if it applies in this case. Is there a general way of trying to find the electric field? Like once you know the flux, shouldn't you theoretically be able to calculate the electric field somehow?
 
uchicago2012 said:
Oh, I see. So I've found the charge, then Q = Bx.
That's better. :approve:
But then how do I go about finding the electric field? I can find the flux by dividing by e0 of course. But the flux = integral (flux * dA) which I'm not sure applies to this problem. Or I can say flux = E*A, which I've seen my book randomly do but I don't know if it applies in this case. Is there a general way of trying to find the electric field? Like once you know the flux, shouldn't you theoretically be able to calculate the electric field somehow?
Look for symmetry. You need to mentally find some sort of surface, called a Gaussian surface, such that the E·dA is constant over any given section of that surface (and it's okay to break up the closed integral into sections if you have to). Look for the situations where the direction dA is parallel to E for all dA of that section of the closed surface (dA points in a direction normal to the surface). If you can find such a Gaussian surface, then

\int_S \vec E \cdot \vec {dA} = \int_S EdA = E \int_S dA

over that section of the surface. (Remember the above situation does not apply for everything -- you need to have a Gaussian surface such that E·dA is constant.) Note how in this situation, the dot product is merely the multiplication of the the magnitudes, and now E becomes a simple, constant scalar and can be pulled out from under the integral.

By the way, there are only a few situations that you can use this method to find E. You can use it for problems like this one where there is cylindrical symmetry, and the charged line or charged cylinder is infinitely long. You can also use for problems with spherical symmetry. And finally, you can use it for infinitely large planes. But that's about it.

Don't get me wrong, Gauss' law is always true in all situations (classical electrodynamics, that is). And if you happened to already know E for all space, you can always use Gauss' law to find the charge enclosed within any closed surface. But the above situations are the only ones that you will use it to find E.
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top