How Does Electromagnetic Theory Explain Forces in a Moving Rod?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the complexities of understanding electromagnetic theory, particularly in relation to a lecture that included several equations without clear explanations. The professor discussed the law of Biot-Savart and how moving a rod in a magnetic field induces a current, leading to various equations related to electromagnetic force and energy dissipation. The participant seeks clarification on five specific equations presented at the end of the lecture, expressing confusion about their meanings and the concept of the gradient in relation to vector calculus. There is a particular focus on the equation E = -(Gradient)v and its implications, as well as the need for a clearer understanding of the gradient operator. Overall, the thread highlights the challenges students face in grasping advanced electromagnetism concepts without adequate instructional support.
Fenter
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
This question is a little bit more difficult. I'm not too sure if I'm in the right place to be posting this type of question- but here it is:

Type: Theory Question regarding electromagnetism

My professor is an extremely difficult person to understand. His notes are all over the place and his equations are not labeled or explained in the slightest.

At the end of his lecture, he gave five equations- None of which are labeled.

I will give you a background of what he was lecturing about with equations along the way to help you understand what was being learned (for those who have taken such a course), then I'm going to give you the five equations at the end for deciphering. Please help me! I would deeply appreciate it.

He lectured about the law of biot and Savart (spelled correctly?) by saying that all current loops induce a magnetic field such that B = ((muo)(NiA))/((2)(pi)(r)). He then proceeded to say that the derivative of the flux of a magnetic field with respect to time is the negative of electromagnetic force. He then applied this to crossbars in a circuit- which when moved at an angle to a magnetic field- would induce a current such that the force resisting it was Fb = iL x B. Since emf = d(flux)/dt = d(B*A)/dt (as given by Ampere's Law) if a rod of Length W moves along a u shaped circuit through a distance L, then d(B*A)/dt --> B*W*(dL/dt). (dl/dt) = velocity = v. Thus emf = B*W*v. This professor went on about how if current went through the rod, the rod would move through the magnetic field and gave equations to show the force that would do this. He then proceeded to show how if the rod were stopped by an external force, the rod would heat up (P = i^2R).

There is nothing more to this lecture other than the five seemingly meaningless equations at the end of the lecture.

Here are the five equations (I will use PR for the partial derivative sign)

1. (Gradient) x E = -PR(B)/PR(t)
2. E = -(Gradient)v - PR(A)/PR(t) For PR(A), A = Area of current loop
3. B = (Gradient) x A
4. (Gradient) dot B = 0
5. (Gradient) dot E = Resistivity/(Permitivity of free space)

I also appologise for the lack of vector notation. It should be pretty obvious which is a vector and which is not.

I hope you can help me with these. I appologise for not not making these equations more beautiful. I'm not sure how many other posters were able to make those images of various equations. In time, I'll figure it out. I hope it's not something as simple as reading the FAQ. In any event- this algebra should not be too difficult to read. The idea behind the lecture is there- anybody who understands the fundamentals of what was written will most definitely know what those five equations mean thus majority of the math is not necessary.

Best Regards,

- Fenter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Still Stuck

I'm beginning to wonder if he was just hinting at future lectures. One of these equations has been addressed in a future lecture. HOWEVER, It's not totally addressed and the problem as to the physical meaning of the equation still puzzles me. it's E = -(Gradient)v. What in the world does the partial derivative of each component in a vector with respect to something mean? Isn't that essentially the derivative?

Furthermore, what IS gradient? I know it's an operator that takes the partial derivative of each component in a vector with respect to SOMETHING- but what? Anything? Does it need to be specified? Can anybody help me?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top