How Does Impact Length Affect Dynamic Tensile Strength in Brittle Materials?

Trevorman
Messages
20
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



Brittle materials as glass and ceramics have generally a much lower tensile strength than compressive strength. A rigid mass impacts the end of a bar (free-free) of such a material and a piece of the other end drops off. Is there a relation between the length of the piece and the dynamic tensile strength of the material?

Clarification
A pressure wave is propagating through the rod, when the wave is reaching the free end at x = L, the wave reflects and becomes a tensile wave.

Homework Equations



## \sigma =E \frac{\partial u}{\partial x} ##
E - Youngs modulus
##\sigma## - stress
u - displacement

The Attempt at a Solution


Newtons second law

## \sigma_0 A - M * \frac{\partial^2 u }{\partial t^2}=0 ##
M - Mass of rod
##\frac{\partial^2 u }{\partial t^2}## -acceleration of the particles
## \sigma_0 ## - Initial stress

Don't really know how to tackle this problem and where to begin.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your Newton's 2nd law equation is not really the correct version for describing the propagation of a wave along the rod. Do a differential force balance on the section of the rod between x and x + Δx, taking into account the mass times acceleration of the material within this segment of the rod, and the tensile forces acting on the two ends of the segment (which differ from one another). The tensile force at each end is equal to the stress on that end times the cross sectional area. Then express each stress as Edu/dx at that location. Let's see what you come up with.

Chet
 
Hi thank you, this is my result from your suggestion. Is this correct?

## \sigma A - (\sigma + \Delta \sigma )A = A \Delta x \rho \frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial t^2}##
##-E\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}A =A\Delta x \rho \frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial t^2}##

So the piece that is flying off ##\Delta x##?
 
Trevorman said:
Hi thank you, this is my result from your suggestion. Is this correct?

## \sigma A - (\sigma + \Delta \sigma )A = A \Delta x \rho \frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial t^2}##
##-E\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}A =A\Delta x \rho \frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial t^2}##

So the piece that is flying off ##\Delta x##?
This is not quite right. The final differential equation should read:

$$\frac{E}{\rho}\frac{\partial ^2 u}{\partial x^2}=\frac{\partial ^2 u}{\partial t^2}$$

This equation is also satisfied by the strain ε.

Now for your problem. I have no idea how to get the answer fundamentally. Just can't see through how to do it. But, the above differential equation must be the starting point.

However, given the nature of the question, we can certainly guess the answer using dimensional analysis. The only length scale in the problem is the length of the rod L. So the length that breaks off, l, must be proportional to L. Also the length that breaks off must be proportional to the ultimate strength. So, dimensionally, the only equation that makes sense to me is:

$$l=L\frac{σ_u}{E}$$

But, how this can be obtained from the fundamental analysis of the problem evades me.

Chet
 
  • Like
Likes Trevorman
Thank you for helping me Chet!

I am familiar with the Wave equation but I cannot figure out how to setup the problem to get out the length of the piece, it is a tricky question. I will come back when I have more information of how the problem can be solved, been scratching my head over this for a while.
 
Okey so I have some additional information now.

When a "stiff" mass hits a rod a exponentially decaying pressure-wave is formed. The pressure wave has a front with the size -zV. The wave propagates forward through the bar and when it is reflected at the free end it replace the signs and become a tension wave which propagates backwards. The rod is then both the reflection and the "tail" of the pressure wave. Net drag force is the difference between the two and if fracture occur in a particular position, you can calculate the tension there (ie, failure stress). It will depend on how long the broken part is.

where z is the impedance and V is the velocity of the stiff mass hitting the rod.
## z = \frac{AE}{c}##
c is the velocity of the propagation speed of the wave, and depends on which way the wave is travelling. ## c=\sqrt{\frac{\rho}{E}}##, where E is ##E_p## when it is a pressure wave and ##E_t## when there is a tension wave.

The solution for the wave equation is the sum of forward and backward waves.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top