How Does Langmuir Kinetics Apply to Adsorption Processes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Zealduke
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kinetics
Zealduke
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Adsorption of many solutes is governed by Langmuir kinetics given below.

Equation 1
dq/dt=ka (qm−q )c−kdq

If a batch of adsorbent pellets of mass M is added to a solution of adsorbate, at an initial concentration ofc0 and volume V, the mass balance yields:

Equation 2
c= co−(M/V)q

Substituting (2) into (1) gives:

Equation 3
dq/dt = aq2 + bq + f

a = ka (M/V)

b = -(ka(M/V)qm + kd + kaco)

f = kaqm

Subject to the initial condition that q (t=0 )=0 Solve Equation (3) by simple quadrature (integration). To do this, first separate the variables q and c and integrate analytically.

The long time solution of Equation (1) should give the Langmuir isotherm.
q*= (qm(ka/kd)c) / ( 1 + ( ka/kd)c )


The Attempt at a Solution




So after plugging in all the data, to isolate q and c I subtracted kaqm and divided by q yielding:

(-kaqm / q) = (ka(M/V)q) - ka(M/V)qm - kd - kaco

Then I added kd to both sides in the hopes to simplify some of the data into the variable c. Not really sure what to do next or if I'm even headed in the right direction. Any thoughts or help would be really appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi.
Seems confusing indeed, since apparently c and q are functions of each other... are you sure you're not asked to separate q and t? because they appear to be the only variables and then equation 3 is integrated easily:
dq/(aq^2 + bq + f) = dt,
then complete the square on the left and change variable, integrate both sides. You can plug back the constants at the end if you like...
 
I appreciate the help, I'm going to run with what you've presented since my professor really doesn't have it together

So as far as completing the square I've got it to (q+(bq/4a))^2 = -f (bq/4a)^2 and it looks like it's about to get ugly, so I feel I'm on the wrong track. Does it look right so far? It's been ages since I've done any calculus, so my next question would be with what do I change the variable with?
 
If you factor out the "a" and take it to the right, you get:
dq/[(q + b/2a)^2 – (b/2a)^2 + f/a] = a•dt
So with x = q + b/2a, dx = dq and g^2 = f/a – (b/2a)^2
your equation has the form: dx/(x^2 + g^2) = a•dt,
which you might find familiar. if you don't, just look up the integral (the right one is trivial of course), it's a very common identity. You may even look up the initial one, i don't know if you're supposed to carry the whole integration...
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top