How Does Lenz's Law Affect Current in Adjacent Loops?

AI Thread Summary
When the current in the upper loop drops to zero, Lenz's law indicates that the lower loop will experience an induced current that opposes the change in magnetic flux. This induced current will increase in the lower loop to counteract the decrease in magnetic field from the upper loop. The discussion emphasizes understanding the direction of the magnetic fields and the application of the right-hand rule to determine the current's behavior. Participants are encouraged to visualize the forces and flux changes to grasp the underlying concepts better. Ultimately, the conclusion is that the current in the lower loop will increase due to the induced effects of the changing current in the upper loop.
Lokhtar
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two conducting loops carry equal currents I in the same direction as shown in the figure. If the current in the upper loop suddenly drops to zero, what will happen to the current in the lower loop according to Lenz’s law?

(a) The current in the lower loop will decrease.
(b) The current in the lower loop will increase.
(c) The current in the lower loop will not change.
(d) The current in the lower loop will also drop to zero.
(e) The current in the lower loop will reverse its direction.
http://img21.imageshack.us/img21/8688/lenzrz5.jpg

Homework Equations



Lenz's law states "Induced emf resulting from a changing magnetic flux has a polarity that leads to an induced current whose direction is such that the induced magnetic field opposes the original flux change."

The Attempt at a Solution



I know that the answer is (b). I am just trying to figure out why.

Lenz's law is just conservation of energy, so if both currents are going in the same direction, than forces are going upwards? If the top one were removed, wouldn't the force acting on the bottom one decrease? I think I am confusing a bunch of things, but trying to understand how/what to approach this problem.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
From your statement of lenz's law, the change in current in the top loop will induce an emf and thus a change in current in the lower loop. This change in current creates a magnetic field. The magnetic field will oppose the change in flux caused by the first loop.

So, to answer this question, you need to answer the following smaller questions:

1. What direction does the change in flux caused by the top loop point?

2. The field created from the change in current in the lower loop must point opposite the change in flux. What direction is this?

3. So, what direction around the loop does the change in current point? HINT: Right hand rule.

4. Does this change in current increase or decrease the current in the lower loop?

Can you answer these questions?
 
G01 said:
1. What direction does the change in flux caused by the top loop point?

Well, if I use the right hand rule, and curl my fingers towards I, my thumb points straight up.

G01 said:
2. The field created from the change in current in the lower loop must point opposite the change in flux. What direction is this?

Counterclockwise?


G01 said:
3. So, what direction around the loop does the change in current point? HINT: Right hand rule.

Up?

G01 said:
4. Does this change in current increase or decrease the current in the lower loop?

Can you answer these questions?

I think I am missing something conceptually, perhaps with the application of RHR.
 
I'm trying to look at the book and trying to visualize the forces, but I don't quite get it.
 
G01 said:
1. What direction does the change in flux caused by the top loop point?
Lokhtar said:
Well, if I use the right hand rule, and curl my fingers towards I, my thumb points straight up.
That's the direction of the flux, but the question asks about the change in flux.

I is initially counterclockwise. If it drops to zero, it's change is in the opposite direction. So curl your fingers in that direction.

G01 said:
2. The field created from the change in current in the lower loop must point opposite the change in flux. What direction is this?
Lokhtar said:
Counterclockwise?
The question is about the magnetic field or flux. This will be either up or down. So the question is, what direction--up or down--is opposite to the change in flux you got for question #1?
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top