How Does Lenz's Law Apply to EMF in a Triaxially Bent Wire?

ghetto_bird25
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A wire is bent into three circular segments each of radius r=9.2 cm. each segment is a quadrant of circle, ab lying in the xy plane, bc, in the yz plane, and ca lying in the zx plane. If a uniform magnetic field points in the positive x direction, what is in volts the magnitude of the emf developed in the wire when B increases at the rate of 3.4 mT/s?
http://edugen.wiley.com/edugen/courses/crs1141/art/images/c31/nw0500-n.gif


Homework Equations


so what i used was faraday's law and lenz's law by using the formula
\epsilon=d(B A)/dt
and then since area (A) is constant you can bring it out. and area would equal 1/4\pir^{2} and the dB/dt is given. the only problem is that i don't know what to do with the components as you have the pieces on all three axis and how wood i deal with each component?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are no components for the EMF. Your projected area seems right.
Just multiply A and dB/dt.
 
oh so jus do it for each section and add it up or make it 3/4pi*r^2 time dB/dt
 
No. The projected area area for the flux is just the pi*r^2/4.
 
oh ok thanks alot
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top