How Does Malus' Law Explain Light Transmission Through Polarizers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Evergreen
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around applying Malus' Law to solve two physics problems involving polarizers and light. The first problem involves determining the initial polarization direction of light when only 11.9 percent passes through two polarizers set at 35.7 degrees to each other. The second question seeks to calculate the width of the first-order spectrum produced by white light on a screen 2.40 meters away from a grating with 7770 lines/cm. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding the variables in Malus' Law, specifically the incident intensity and the angle between the light's polarization direction and the polarizer's axis. Resources for further reading on Malus' Law are suggested for those needing additional help.
Evergreen
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
need help with capa questions...

Two polarizers are oriented at 35.7o to each other and plane-polarized light is incident on them. If only 11.9 percent of the light gets through both of them, what was the initial polarization direction of the incident light?


White light containing wavelengths from 391 nm to 758 nm falls on a grating with 7770 lines/ cm. How wide is the first-order spectrum on a screen 2.40 m away?




just two questions, i have no clue... :redface:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Evergreen said:
Two polarizers are oriented at 35.7o to each other and plane-polarized light is incident on them. If only 11.9 percent of the light gets through both of them, what was the initial polarization direction of the incident light?
Are you familiar with Malus' Law? It says that if linearly polarized light passes through a polarizer, the intensity of the light transmitted is I = Iincidentcos2(θ), where θ is the angle between the polarization direction of the incident light and the polarization axis (transmission axis) of the polarizer.
White light containing wavelengths from 391 nm to 758 nm falls on a grating with 7770 lines/ cm. How wide is the first-order spectrum on a screen 2.40 m away?
Take a peek at these threads:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=16902
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=17047
 
i need a numeric answer, for the second question that I am posting, i did use a similar method, but my answer is still wrong
 
Evergreen said:
i need a numeric answer, for the second question that I am posting, i did use a similar method, but my answer is still wrong
Show your work and I'll take a look.
 
Last edited:
Doc Al said:
Are you familiar with Malus' Law? It says that if linearly polarized light passes through a polarizer, the intensity of the light transmitted is I = Iincidentcos2(θ), where θ is the angle between the polarization direction of the incident light and the polarization axis (transmission axis) of the polarizer.
QUOTE]
I have a question on this also...
I am fairly new with this material, and I know that I am trying to find theta, but what do I plug in for I and Io? Is there any good reading online for this?
 
Law of Malus

PrettyMz4Christ said:
I have a question on this also...
I am fairly new with this material, and I know that I am trying to find theta, but what do I plug in for I and Io?
That depends on what you are given in the problem. If you have a specific problem, post it and your work and I'll take a look. (You might want to start a new thread.)

I give a brief description of Malus' law in my earlier post.
Is there any good reading online for this?
Do a search on Malus' Law and you'll find plenty. Here's one place to start: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/phyopt/polcross.html#c3

Welcome to PF!
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Intensity of light passing through 3 polarizers
Replies
3
Views
6K
Understanding Polarization: Solving a Problem with the Law of Malus
Replies
4
Views
3K
What was the initial polarization direction of the incident light?
Replies
3
Views
2K
Vertically polarized light from a hene laser passes through a linear
Replies
6
Views
2K
I What happens when circular polarization meets a diagonal polarizer?
Replies
20
Views
3K
A How Does MWI explain Type I PDC Photon Polarization Entanglement?
Replies
19
Views
204
Intensity of light through two polarizers and Malus's Law
Replies
2
Views
11K
Does light passed through two window screens get polarized?
Replies
8
Views
2K
How does the reflection of light at different angles affect polarization?
Replies
7
Views
1K
Infinite number of polarisers (Malus's law)
Replies
1
Views
5K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top