How Does Maxwell-Boltzmann Distribution Calculate Excited Mercury Atoms?

inferno298
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



You will recall from our discussion of the Franck-Hertz experiment that the energy difference between the first excited state of mercury and the ground state is 4.86 eV. If a sample of mercury vaporized in a flame contains 1.02×10^20 atoms in thermal equilibrium at 1613 K, calculate the number of atoms in the first excited state. Assume that the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution applies and that the n = 1 (ground) and n = 2 (first excited) states have equal statistical weights.

Homework Equations



n2/n1=g(E2)/g(E1)*e^((E1-E2)/(k T))
k=boltzman constant = (1.3807*10^-23), divide by 1.602*10^-19 to get in eV

The Attempt at a Solution



So I felt like it was almost a plug and chug. The distinct states at n=2, first excited state, is 8. For n=1 g(E1)= 2. Sooo :
n2/n1=(8/2)*e^((-4.86 eV)/(k*1613))
I got 2.626*10^-15, so that's the ratio of atoms in the first excited state compared to the ground state? So I just multiply it by the number of atoms 1.02*10^20 and I get 267884 atoms. Answer isn't correct though and I can't figure out what I may be missing.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
inferno298 said:
Assume that the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution applies and that the n = 1 (ground) and n = 2 (first excited) states have equal statistical weights.
Have you made use of the last part of this statement?
 
I guess I am not too sure of what that means.
 
nmv I got it Thanks!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top