How Does Relativity Affect the Length and Orientation of a Moving Rod?

  • Thread starter Thread starter frankR
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relativity Rod
AI Thread Summary
An observer moving at 0.995c measures a rod's length as 2.00m and at a 30-degree angle to the direction of motion. The proper length of the rod, calculated using Lorentz contraction, is determined to be approximately 17.3m. The orientation angle in the rod's rest frame is found to be around 3.30 degrees. The discussion highlights the importance of using systematic notation for clarity in mathematical expressions. Overall, the calculations are confirmed to be correct, with suggestions for cleaner notation to enhance readability.
frankR
Messages
91
Reaction score
0
An observer, moving at a speed of 0.995c relative to a rod as shown measures its length to be 2.00m and sees its length to be oriented at 30.0 degrees with respect to the direction of motion.

a) What is the proper length of the rod? (Length as measured at rest)

b) What is the orientation angle in a reference frame moving with the rod? (Again, in rest frame)


I've found the correct values, however the math seems ambiguous. I was wondering if there was another way to solve it, with cleaner mathematics.

Do = the length of the rod as measure when the rod is moving a .995c
Lo = the adjacent side of the triangle formed by the rod moving at .995

Lo = DoCos(30.0)

D = the actual length of the rod as observed from the rest frame
L = the actual length of the adjacent side of the triangle formed by the rod in the rest frame
@ = the angle formed between L and D.
h = height of the rest frame triangle

L = Lo/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) = DoCos(30)/sqrt{(1-(.995c)^2/c^2)}

L = 17.34m

To find D you can use the following equations.

Tan(@) = h/L
Sin(@) = h/D
Cos(@)=L/D
D^2 = L^2 + h^2

I ended up getting this to solve for D.

D = sqrt{L^2 + L^2*Sin^2{Cos^-1(L/D)}^2}

My calculator solved it and got D = 17.26m or 17.42m.

The answers are 17.3m and 3.30 degree.

Is there a cleaner way to do it?

Am I missing something?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would only clean up the notation. Instead of using different letters for each quantity, I would use subscripts and primes.

L=Length of rod in frame S
Lx=Lcos(30)=component of length in direction of motion in frame S
Ly=Lsin(30)=component of length perpendicular to motion in S

and use L', Lx' and Ly' for the corresponding quantities in frame S'.
 
My math is okay then?

My notation is a lot cleaner on paper, a lot cleaner the second and third time I worked the problem out. How do you make subscripts?

Thanks for your help!
 
Originally posted by frankR
My math is okay then?

Yes, there's no other way to do it. But, using a more systematic notation will help whoever reads it (like the grader).

How do you make subscripts?

Subscripts:
If you type this: v[ sub ]0[ /sub ]
without the spaces you will get: v0.

Superscripts:
If you type this: v[ sup ]2[ /sup ]
without the spaces you will get: v2.

You can also combine the two as follows: v[ sub ]0[ /sub ][ sup ]2[ /sup ]
to get v02.
 
CoolThanks!
 
Something else: Regarding Greek letters. The ones in the "Smiley" menu (the ones you've been using) are really ugly, and what's worse they don't respond well to being superscripted or subscripted.

e[mu]
e[mu]

See?

Instead, use the forum code for this, like so:

& mu ;

without the spaces gives

μ

and for capitals, simply capitalize the name of the Greek letter, like so:

& Mu ;

to get

Μ

These will super- and subscript nicely, like so:

eμ
eμ
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top