How Does Special Relativity Affect Uncle Joe's Appearance at High Speed?

Ashley1nOnly
Messages
132
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement



After year of over-eating and no exercise, Uncle Joe's is overweight, with a waist 50cm wide. He's also out of shape and can only hold his breath for 20 seconds. Worse, he can only jump 20cm high. But at his high-school reunion, he'd like to fool his old friends who haven;t seen him in years, into thinking otherwise by using special relativity. If he speeds by them on a vehicle that's traveling horizontally at (3/5)c, and he's standing vertically, holding his breath, and then jumping vertically, what will they observe for Uncle Joe's waist size (width), breath-holding time, and jumping height.

Homework Equations



L=L0 Sqrt(1-(v/c)^2)

The Attempt at a Solution


where v=3/5c c= 3.0*10^8 and L0= 50

I want to know if this is the right equation and if I am using it right
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Depends on your reasoning ... that is certainly the length contraction equation: ##L = L_0/\gamma## this means that ##L<L_0## - is that what you want?

note: ##v \neq 3/5c## you are told that ##v=(3/5)c = 3c/5## (pedantic I know, but pedantery is important in relativity)
... this means that ##(v/c)=3/5 \implies (v/c)^2 = 9/25##, so now you don't need a value for ##c## for your equation... in fact the numbers have been chosen so you don't need a calculator.
Also - what about how long he can hold his breath for?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top