How Does the Casimir Effect Utilize the Euler-Maclaurin Formula?

epislon58
Messages
49
Reaction score
1
Hello,

I am attempting to repeat the math found on page 4 of this paper using the Euler-maclaurin summation formula. How would I incorporate the conversion factor because I can not figure it out for the life in me!

Thank you!

http://www.hep.caltech.edu/~phys199/lectures/lect5_6_cas.pdf
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Using the conversion factor means that we can write

$$\nu = -\lim_{\epsilon\rightarrow 0} \frac{d}{d\epsilon} e^{-\epsilon \nu}.$$

Note that I take ##\epsilon\rightarrow 0## instead of ##\infty## like in the text. I suspect the ##\infty## is a typo.

This conversion factor is useful, because we can then write the sum as

$$ \sum_{\nu = 1}^\infty \nu = -\lim_{\epsilon\rightarrow 0} \frac{d}{d\epsilon} \sum_{\nu = 1}^\infty e^{-\epsilon \nu}.$$

Since ##e^{-\epsilon} < 1##, we can recognize this as a geometric series and do the sum. Expanding the result in ##\epsilon## will leave a divergent term, a finite term, and terms that vanish as ##\epsilon\rightarrow 0##. Introducing ## e^{-\epsilon \nu}## into the integral gives a result that cancels the divergent term in the sum. We are then left with a finite result when we compute the difference between the sum and integral.

Alternatively, one can use the Euler-Maclaurin formula, which is also referred to in the text.
 
Thank you, but the text states that they used the Euler-Macluarin and the conversion factor. Could this have been a typo?
 
epislon58 said:
Thank you, but the text states that they used the Euler-Macluarin and the conversion factor. Could this have been a typo?

You only need one of the methods. Give it a try.
 
oh ok thank you. I will let you know how it turns out asap!
 
For using the Euler-Maclaurin formula, the hint might be that you should use ##e^{-\epsilon \nu}## as a "convergence" factor (rather than a "conversion" factor). Then let ##\epsilon \rightarrow 0## (not ∞, as fzero has already noted).

Thus, consider the argument of the sum or integral to be ##\nu e^{-\epsilon \nu}##. Without the convergence factor, you run into trouble for ##\nu \rightarrow \infty## in the Euler-Maclaurin formula.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top