How Does the Cosmological Constant Change with the Expansion of the Universe?

TRB8985
Messages
74
Reaction score
15

Homework Statement


Suppose (incorrectly) that H scales as temperature squared all the way back until the time when the temperature of the universe was 1019 GeV/kB (i.e., suppose the universe was radiation dominated all the way back to the Planck time).

Also suppose that today the dark energy is in the form of a cosmological constant Λ, such that ρΛ today is equal to 0.7*ρcritical and ρΛ remains constant throughout the history of the universe. What was ρΛ / (3H2/8πG) back then?

(From Modern Cosmology by Dodelson, pg. 25)

Homework Equations


ρ_critical = (3H02/8πG)

T = 1019 GeV/kB = 1.16045* 1032 K

T0 = 2.725 K

For a radiation-dominated universe, a ∝ t1/2.

The Attempt at a Solution



I understand a part of the solution wherein ρΛ / ρcritical = 0.7, but I'm supposed to multiply this value by something.

In the answer key, Dodelson multiplies 0.7 by the ratio of (H0 / H)2. The text states:

"By assumption, the universe is forever radiation dominated (clearly not true today, but a good approximation early on), so H / H0 = a-2."

Given this, the inverse of H / H0 would result in a2, and since H scales as temperature squared, then (a2)2 = a4 which can then be applied to the ratio of the temperature. That latter part makes sense. However, I'm not quite understanding where Dodelson pulled the ratio of H0 / H from to get things started.

Could anyone provide any insight on this? Thank you very much for your help.

(This question is being attempted via an independent study and not a homework question. Additionally, there are no cosmology specialists at my university who could provide any useful feedback on how to attack this situation.)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TRB8985 said:

Homework Statement


Suppose (incorrectly) that H scales as temperature squared ...

Multiply the expression in the exercise by one in the form ##1 = \rho_{cr} / \rho_{cr}##, then use equation (1.3) to substitute for ##\rho_{cr}## in the numerator (but not in the denominator).
 
  • Like
Likes TRB8985
George, your input was incredibly helpful and brought the entire picture together. Thank you so much for your help! I appreciate that.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top