How Does the London van der Waals Force Relate to the Casimir Effect?

Kruger
Messages
213
Reaction score
0
The London van der Waals force is approximatly given by F=-c *a^-7 where a is the distance between two neutral atoms and c is something like this:

C=-23*hbar*c/4pi*(alpha1*alpha2)

where alpha1 and alpha2 =(epsilon-1)/(4pi*N)

and N is the atom number density and epsilon the permittivity.

--> Question 1: Does that mean if I have a body with 10^30 atoms the moledule number density is 10^30?

Now from the force between neutral atoms we can get to the Casimir-force. We can then just calclulate how much one atom of Plate A is attracted by the atoms of the other plates. Doing so with all atoms on Plate A we can sum over all the resulting forces and have the Casimir-Force.

Question 2: is this correct?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Kruger said:
The London van der Waals force is approximatly given by F=-c *a^-7 where a is the distance between two neutral atoms and c is something like this:
C=-23*hbar*c/4pi*(alpha1*alpha2)
where alpha1 and alpha2 =(epsilon-1)/(4pi*N)
and N is the atom number density and epsilon the permittivity.
--> Question 1: Does that mean if I have a body with 10^30 atoms the moledule number density is 10^30?
Now from the force between neutral atoms we can get to the Casimir-force.
The molecule number density cannot be dimensionless, so you have to divide 10^30 by the volume of the body.
 
The Casimir force is related but not identical to the van der Waals force, a fact which was first explicitly demonstrated by E. M. Lif****z and later J. Schwinger in the 1950's. In particular, the Casimir force is strongly dependent on the geometry of the system and is actually repulsive between two metal hemispheres. This revelation spoiled Schwinger's attempt to explain sonoluminescence using the Casimir force.


Lif****z's Paper:
E. M. Lif****z, Sov. Phys. JETP 2, 73, 1956

A nice experiment and good discussion:
http://prola.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v78/i1/p5_1

Edit: Ha! This is somewhat absurd, I can't write Lif****z's name because it has **** in it.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top