How does the mass of a ball affect the % of energy loss

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on how the mass of a ball influences the percentage of energy loss during bounces. It is suggested that mass alone does not affect energy loss because a heavier ball, made of the same material, retains the same elasticity and density, leading to similar efficiency. The physics behind bouncing, particularly the coefficient of restitution, indicates that if mass doubles, both energy input and energy lost also double, leaving the percentage unchanged. However, there are scenarios where mass could impact energy loss, such as when a heavier mass causes structural failure in a fragile object, resulting in less bounce. Overall, the relationship between mass and energy loss is complex and can vary based on specific conditions.
Drake M
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am wondering how the mass of a ball affects the percentage of energy loss when the ball bounces.

Homework Equations


Ep=mgh
eff=eout/ein x 100%

The Attempt at a Solution


1)I don't think it affects them because if the ball is heavier but still made of the same material it has the same elasticity and density only mass has changed. But if all of the starting Ep goes to Ek then it should have generally the same efficiency. If this is correct please tell me why its correct and if its wrong then explain it. Thanks in advance. Cheers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you familiar with coefficient of restitution? If so, write down the equation for rebound velocity.
 
No, we haven't learned that in class so we wouldn't be allowed to use it as a reason on a test or lab. I am just trying to think of a reasonable explanation as to why. I did the experiment but there didn't seem to be correlation between the two variables.
 
Basically what I'm asking is why doesn't mass affect energy loss
 
Drake M said:
Basically what I'm asking is why doesn't mass affect energy loss
There is no lay-down reason. It comes out of the physics behind bouncing, as is described by the equation involving coefficient of restitution. I can offer an explanation of why it might not affect the percentage lost. Doubling the mass doubles the energy invested. If it also doubles the energy lost then the percentage doesn't change. Does it seem reasonable that doubling the energy in doubles the loss?

On the other hand, I can conceive of a physical behaviour in which the mass does affect the percentage loss. Imagine dropping an assembly consisting of a small mass stuck on top of an egg stuck on top of a rubber pad, just a short distance. If the mass is small enough the egg stays intact and you get a decent bounce. With a heavier mass the egg cracks and the bounce is less. You could also imagine an analogous behaviour at the nanoscale within a material.
 
  • Like
Likes Drake M
Thanks
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top