How Does Torque Affect Angular Velocity in a Falling Block and Wheel System?

AI Thread Summary
In a falling block and wheel system, the gravitational potential energy of a mass m falling a distance h is converted into both linear and rotational kinetic energy. The angular speed of the wheel, omega_A, can be expressed in terms of m, g, h, r_A, and I when the string is attached to the outer radius r_A. Similarly, when the string is wrapped around a smaller axle of radius r_B, omega_B can be expressed in terms of m, g, h, r_B, and I. The discussion clarifies that torque is not necessary for solving this problem; instead, conservation of mechanical energy is the key principle to apply. This understanding allows for the correct calculation of angular velocities in both scenarios.
~angel~
Messages
150
Reaction score
0
Consider a bicycle wheel that initially is not rotating. A block of mass m is attached to the wheel and is allowed to fall a distance h. Assume that the wheel has a moment of inertia I about its rotation axis.

Consider the case that the string tied to the block is attached to the outside of the wheel, at a radius r_A. Find omega_A, the angular speed of the wheel after the block has fallen a distance h, for this case.
Express omega_A in terms of m, g, h, r_A, and I.

Now consider the case that the string tied to the block is wrapped around a smaller inside axle of the wheel of radius r_B View Figure . Find omega_B, the angular speed of the wheel after the block has fallen a distance h, for this case.
Express omega_B in terms of m, g, h, r_B, and I.

Someone told me that I have incorporate torque into it. I initially thought that you needed to use the conservation of energy, etc. Any help would be great.
 

Attachments

  • MRB_ke_a.jpg
    MRB_ke_a.jpg
    9.3 KB · Views: 565
Physics news on Phys.org
You are correct. It is not necessary to consider torque in this problem. You need to use conservation of mechanical energy. The gravitational potential energy of the elevated mass is released as it falls and converted into the linear and rotational kinetic energies of the mass and the wheel, respectively.
 
Ok...I got the answer. Thanks.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top