How does ∇ × J = 0 relate to B = 0 in Maxwell's equations?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving that a current density J(r, t) with ∇ × J = 0 leads to a magnetic field B = 0, but participants express skepticism about the validity of this statement. They reference examples, such as a steady current in a long wire, where ∇ × J = 0 does not imply B = 0, as a stable magnetic field exists around the wire. The conversation suggests that the problem may be mis-stated and proposes exploring related properties, particularly under conditions where the electric field is steady. Participants seek clarification on the correct interpretation of the problem and express confusion over the mathematical implications. Overall, the thread highlights the complexities of applying Maxwell's equations in specific scenarios.
It's me
Messages
34
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Prove that a current density J(r, t) such that ∇ × J = 0 implies the magnetic field B = 0.

Homework Equations



Maxwell's equations, vector calculus

The Attempt at a Solution



I've played around with Maxwell's equations and with the properties of vector calculus but I can't reach the necessary conclusion. Any hints would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the problem may have been mis-stated because, as stated, it looks false.
Consider a point outside a long, straight wire carrying a steady, direct current. ∇ × J=0 at that point because J=0 in an open neighbourhood of that point. But B is not zero. It is a stable, nonzero field that runs around the wire.
The proposition fails inside the wire too: see these calcs.
 
Thank you very much, I had the feeling something was wrong when the math just didn't agree with the statement.
Do you know of any property that is similar to the one I was trying to prove? I mean, if the problem is mis-stated, any ideas as to what the correct statement is?
 
Given those conditions, if we also have ##\frac{\partial\mathbf{E}}{dt}=0##, which will for instance be correct if the current is steady, then we can deduce that ##\nabla^2\mathbf{B}=0##. Perhaps they meant that.
 
Ok thanks, I really appreciate your help.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top