How Efficient is a 100-hp Car Engine Compared to Carnot Efficiency?

mmg0789
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
A 100-hp car engine operates at about 15 percent efficiency. assume that the engine's water temperature is 85deg C is its cold-temperature (exhaust) reservoir and 500deg C is its thermal "intake" temperature (the temperature of the exploding gas/air mixture)

a)calculate its efficiency relative to its maximum possible (Carnot) efficiency

b) estimate how much power (in watts) goes into moving the car, and how much heat, in joules and in kcal, is exhausted to the air in 1 h.

--i'm not sure how to go about this problem any help is appreciated


Thanks in Advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mmg0789 said:
A 100-hp car engine operates at about 15 percent efficiency. assume that the engine's water temperature is 85deg C is its cold-temperature (exhaust) reservoir and 500deg C is its thermal "intake" temperature (the temperature of the exploding gas/air mixture)

a)calculate its efficiency relative to its maximum possible (Carnot) efficiency

b) estimate how much power (in watts) goes into moving the car, and how much heat, in joules and in kcal, is exhausted to the air in 1 h.

--i'm not sure how to go about this problem any help is appreciated


Thanks in Advance
The Carnot efficiency is easily calculated. What percent of the maximum possible efficiency (the Carnot efficiency) is the engine achieving?

The 15% efficiency tells you what fraction of the input energy is going into moving the car. The rest goes out in the exhaust.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top