How far did the train travel before stopping after detaching a compartment?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the distance a train travels after its last compartment detaches while moving up a 4-degree incline at 5 m/s. Initial calculations yielded an incorrect distance of 0.09 m, prompting a request for clarification. A more accurate approach involves equating the initial kinetic energy of the compartment to its potential energy at the maximum height reached. By applying trigonometry to convert the height into distance along the incline, a correct distance of over 18 m is determined. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly interpreting the problem and applying energy conservation principles.
mrhobbes
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
A train moving up an incline at 4 degrees has it's last train compartment detached. The train was moving at a speed of 5 m/s when the compartment breaks free. How far did the train get before the speed momentarily reaches zero?

No other information is given, but using all that was provided, I got a ridiculously small answer of 0.09 m. I got this by splitting up my speed into x and y components and then using the Vo(y) in the equation d= vf² - vo² / 2a to get my vertical displacement. I then used distance to get my inclined displacement by using sin 5 = y / r.

I checked the answer and it turns out that it was wrong. Could anyone give me any hints on how to solve the problem?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.
The question doesn't make much sense as written. Perhaps it means a train CAR breaks free from the back of the train. Without engine. How far does the CAR go up the hill?

It's initial speed is 5 m/s. Since it is going up the hill, its KE will soon be converted into PE. You could begin with
initial KE = final PE
.5*mv² = mgh
and quickly find the height reached from the initial position. You'll have to convert that into a (larger) distance along the ramp with a bit of trigonometry. I'm getting a little more than 18 m.
 
Thank you so much. You were right.
 
Most welcome! Good luck with the next one.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top