How Far is the Pendulum from the Axis on a Rotating Platform?

Luke1121
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A pendulum is placed on a rotating platform which rotates with angular velocity ω around an axis, at equilibrium the angle between vertical and pendulum is θ
θ= 20 degrees
ω= 10 1/s
how far is the pendulum placed from the axis


Homework Equations


a_c=\frac{v^2}{R}=\omega^2R



The Attempt at a Solution


the frame is non inertial so effective g is \sqrt{g^2 + \omega^2R}

I'm not really sure where to go from here, i thought about doing
\omega=\sqrt{\frac{g}{l}}=\sqrt{\frac{g^2 + \omega^2R}{l}} and solving for R however l isn't given so I'm not really sure where to go next, any ideas?

Thanks, Luke
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are wrong considering a mathematical pendulum instead of conic one.

So you may write down (T is a funicular force):
$$
m a_c = m ω^2 R = T sinθ
$$
$$
0 = T cosθ - m g
$$
 
GregoryS said:
You are wrong considering a mathematical pendulum instead of conic one.

So you may write down (T is a funicular force):
$$
m a_c = m ω^2 R = T sinθ
$$
$$
0 = T cosθ - m g
$$
Ah ok, so:

Tcos\theta=mg (1)<br /> Tsin\theta=m\omega^2R (2)


doing (2)/(1) gives

R=\frac{gtan\theta}{\omega^2}

plugging in the numbers gives 0.036m, is this correct?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top