How Far Will the Spring Compress When a Block is Dropped?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cd80187
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Block Spring
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a block dropped from a height onto a spring, focusing on the maximum compression of the spring. It relates to concepts of energy conservation, specifically gravitational potential energy and elastic potential energy.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of energy conservation principles, questioning the correct application of gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy in the context of the spring's compression.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on equating gravitational potential energy to elastic potential energy, while others are exploring the implications of the height from which the block is dropped and the additional compression of the spring. Multiple interpretations of the problem setup are being examined.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the initial height being 55 cm, but participants note that the total height must account for the additional distance the block falls as the spring compresses. The discussion reflects uncertainty regarding the correct equations and assumptions to use.

cd80187
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
A block of mass m = 1.8 kg is dropped from height h = 55 cm onto a spring of spring constant k = 1420 N/m (Fig. 8-36). Find the maximum distance the spring is compressed.

For this problem, I began by using the equation 2a(change in x) = (Velocity final) squared since velocity inital is simply 0. After that, I applied the equation 1/2m(v squared) to find the amount of kinetic energy, since looking at this system, there is no potential at the point where it hits the spring. Next, I said that the potential energy of the spring (1/2k (x squared)) + mg(change in y) = KE that I found from the first step. Next I formed a quadratic equation and found what the distance compressed was, but my answer is still incorrect, so I was just wondering what I was doing wrong, and if so, how to solve it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cd80187 said:
For this problem, I began by using the equation 2a(change in x) = (Velocity final) squared since velocity inital is simply 0. After that, I applied the equation 1/2m(v squared) to find the amount of kinetic energy, since looking at this system, there is no potential at the point where it hits the spring. Next, I said that the potential energy of the spring (1/2k (x squared)) + mg(change in y) = KE that I found from the first step. Next I formed a quadratic equation and found what the distance compressed was, but my answer is still incorrect, so I was just wondering what I was doing wrong, and if so, how to solve it.


You don't need to calculate kinetic energy. The initial energy is mgh. Assuming the spring to have negligible length, the finial energy is just 1/2(k)x^2. Equation these two will give you the spring displacement.
 
what about gravitational potential energy? and what would I use for the height for the initial energy?
 
Change in GPE of the block = EPE stored in the spring.

Just remember that the h you're using isn't just the 55cm. The block will fall further as the spring compresses (assuming that 55cm is the distance to the top of the spring?). SO h = 55cm + x.
 
cd80187 said:
Next, I said that the potential energy of the spring (1/2k (x squared)) + mg(change in y) = KE that I found from the first step. Next I formed a quadratic equation and found what the distance compressed was, but my answer is still incorrect...
Euclid, subject to the point made by rsk, is correct. The change in gravitational potential energy, mgh, is equal to the kinetic energy just before the spring starts compressing. That kinetic energy - plus a bit more gravitational potential as the spring compresses and the mass drops that compression distance -is then stored in the spring.

That gives you a quadratic equation that you should be able to readily solve.

AM
 
So I am slow... what equations do you use for this problem?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
999
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
24
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K