How Fast Do Charged Particles Move When Halving Their Initial Separation?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the speed of two charged particles as they move toward each other after being released from rest. The initial approach involved using Coulomb's Law to determine the force between the charges and applying Newton's second law to find acceleration. However, a suggestion was made to use the conservation of energy principle, where the change in electric potential energy as the particles move closer should equal the kinetic energy gained. The conversation highlights confusion regarding the application of energy equations and seeks clarification on how to properly implement this method. Overall, the participants are exploring different methods to solve the problem effectively.
nutster
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Here's the problem:
Two particles each have a mass of 6.6x10^-3 kg. One has a charge of +5.0x10^-6 C, and the other has a charge of -5.0x10^-6 C. They are initially held at rest at a distance of 0.70 m apart. Both are then released and accelerate toward each other. How fast is each particle moving when the separation between them is one-half its initial value?


I've tried a couple of different ways to attack this, with this one making the most sense to 'me' :smile: :

Knowing both charges and the distance between them, I applied Coulomb's Law to determine a force of .459 (maybe this is my problem? One charge has to remain stationary..?)

I then applied this to Newton's F=ma, which would yield an acceleration of 69.49 m/s/s. I finally applied this to Kinematics and found the final velocity after 0.175m (the distance each particle traveled after a combined 0.30 m change in distance).


So...where'd it all go wrong? I doubt I'm attacking this the right away, so any thoughts are appreciated :)

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try approaching it from conservation of energy.

Initially, there is a potential energy of some amount with the charges at some separation, and the total kinetic energy is 0.

Then calculate the potential energy when they are at half the distance. The change in potential energy should equal the resulting kinetic energy - assuming no losses due to radiation.
 
I don't understand where we're going with EPE :rolleyes: Might you be able to provide equations to show what you mean?

Thanks again
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top