How High Must a Cylinder Roll to Loop-the-Loop?

AI Thread Summary
To determine the minimum height h for a cylinder to successfully loop a track of radius r_2, the cylinder must have sufficient potential energy at the top of the loop. At this point, the potential energy is calculated as 2*r_2*m*g, and the relationship between linear and angular velocity is crucial, expressed as v = R*omega. The absence of normal force at the top indicates that gravitational force must provide the necessary centripetal force to keep the cylinder on the track. The kinetic energy equation, K = 1/2Mv_cm^2 + 1/2 I_cm*omega^2, will help in relating the energies involved. A free body diagram at the top of the loop will clarify the forces acting on the cylinder and assist in solving the problem.
GemmaN
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
In this problem you will consider the motion of a cylinder of radius r_1 that is rolled from a certain height h so that it "loops the loop," that is, rolls around the track with a loop of radius r_2. The cylinder rolls without slipping.
It looks like your standard matchbox car loop.

I need to find the minimum height h that will allow a solid cylinder of mass m and radius r_1 to loop the loop of radius r_2. "Express h in terms of the radius r_2 of the loop."

I am not quite getting a certain portion of this. I know the important part of this problem is when the cylinder is at the top of the loop.
Now, at this point, I know it has a potential energy of 2*r_2*m*g
To stay on the track without slipping, I think I need v = R*omega
At the top part of the track, the cylinder is upside down, and has no normal force... so weight matters?

I may need to use this: K = 1/2Mv_cm^2 + 1/2 I_cm*omega^2

mgh = (2)r_2(mg) + KE? + ?

I am a bit confused at this point. How am I suppose to put this together?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are correct in that the "important part of this problem is when the cylinder is at the top of the loop".

Hint -- draw a free body diagram for the system at that location.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top