How High Must Muons Travel to Reach Earth's Surface?

bon
Messages
547
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



a burst of muons is produced by a cosmic ray interacting in the upper atmosphere. They travel towards the Earth's surface with an average speed of 0.99c. If 1% survive to reach ground level, estimate the height of the burst.

muon mean lifetime is 2.2 x 10^-6 s



The Attempt at a Solution



well i guess the mean lifetime is given in the muon frame..

therefore mean lifetime in labf = 2.2 x 10^-6 x 1/lorentz factor

then i continue, using A = Ao e^-lambda t

where lambda = ln2/T(1/2)

where T(1/2) is the half life, i.e. half of the mean lifetime i calculated above..

then when i found the time, i just used dist = speed x time where speed = 0.99c to calculate the distance..but it didnt come up with the right answer..

where am i going wrong?

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think mean lifetime is 1/\lambda

You can check by calculating the mean from the probability distribution,

\langle t \rangle = \int_0^{\infty} t e^{-\lambda t} dt
 
clamtrox said:
I think mean lifetime is 1/\lambda

You can check by calculating the mean from the probability distribution,

\langle t \rangle = \int_0^{\infty} t e^{-\lambda t} dt

Great! Thanks
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top